AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kasai, S.
Right arrow Articles by Doi, K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kasai, S.
Right arrow Articles by Doi, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3091
AJR 2008; 191:260-265
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Usefulness of Computer-Aided Diagnosis Schemes for Vertebral Fractures and Lung Nodules on Chest Radiographs

Satoshi Kasai1,2, Feng Li1, Junji Shiraishi1 and Kunio Doi1

1 Kurt Rossmann Laboratories for Radiologic Image Research, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
2 Present address: R & D Center, Konica Minolta Medical and Graphic, 2970 Ishikawa-machi, Hachioji City, Tokyo, 192-8505, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. We retrospectively evaluated the usefulness of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) schemes to radiologist performance in the simultaneous detection of vertebral fractures and lung nodules on chest radiographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We evaluated posteroanterior and lateral chest images of 21 patients with vertebral fractures, 31 patients with lung nodules, and 10 persons acting as controls. The total number of subjects was 60 because both lesions were present in four patients. Eighteen radiologists were asked to detect vertebral fractures and nodules simultaneously on posteroanterior and lateral images. The radiologists indicated their confidence level ratings regarding the presence or absence of lesions and the most likely location of each lesion on either posteroanterior or lateral images, first without and then with CAD output. The observers' performance was evaluated with use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and jackknife free-response ROC curves.

RESULTS. With the CAD scheme, the average area under the ROC curve for detection of vertebral fractures improved from 0.906 to 0.951 (p = 0.002). That for lung nodules also improved, but the improvement was not statistically significant (0.804–0.816, p = 0.297). The figure-of-merit values obtained with the jackknife free-response ROC program improved from 0.585 to 0.680 (p < 0.001) for vertebral fractures and from 0.622 to 0.650 (p = 0.017) for nodules, both results having statistical significance. Average sensitivity in the detection of lesions improved from 59.8% to 69.3% for vertebral fractures and from 64.9% to 67.6% for nodules.

CONCLUSION. In the detection of vertebral fractures and lung nodules on chest images, diagnostic accuracy among radiologists improves with the use of CAD.

Keywords: chest radiography • computer-aided diagnosis • lung nodules • observer study • vertebral fractures


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.