AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Smet, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fine, J. P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Smet, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fine, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3034
AJR 2008; 191:93-99
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Clinical and MRI Findings Associated with False-Positive Knee MR Diagnoses of Medial Meniscal Tears

Arthur A. De Smet1, David H. Nathan2, Ben K. Graf3, Benjamin A. Haaland4 and Jason P. Fine4

1 Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave., E3/311, Madison, WI 53792.
2 Central Illinois Radiological Associates, Peoria, IL.
3 Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
4 Department of Biostatistics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to determine if false-positive MR diagnoses of a medial meniscal tear are more common with specific clinical variables, tear type or location, or MRI findings of a longitudinal tear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed the records of 559 patients who underwent knee MR examinations and arthroscopy. We compared the positive predictive values (PPVs) of an MR diagnosis of a medial meniscal tear for differences in tear location or type, delay between knee injury and MRI, delay between MRI and arthroscopy, and the presence of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. We also retrospectively reviewed the MR examinations of 50 longitudinal tears to compare the PPVs of various MRI findings of a longitudinal tear.

RESULTS. There was no association between either the delay between injury and MRI or the delay between MRI and arthroscopy and false-positive diagnoses. The PPV of 64% (32/50) for longitudinal tears was lower than the values of 83% (15/18) to 100% (116/116) for other types of medial meniscal tears. False-positive diagnoses of medial meniscal tears were more common in patients who had a prior episode of acute trauma (p = 0.004) or an ACL tear (p < 0.0001). Review of longitudinal tears revealed a decreased PPV when MRI showed signal contacting only the superior surface (p = 0.016) or when MRI showed signal contacting the surface at the meniscocapsular junction (p = 0.004). Four of the 18 menisci with a false-positive diagnosis of a longitudinal tear had a healed ACL tear noted at arthroscopy.

CONCLUSION. False-positive MR diagnoses of medial meniscal tears are more common for longitudinal tears than other tear types and are also more common with MR abnormalities at either the superior surface or the meniscocapsular junction. Spontaneous healing of longitudinal tears accounts for some false-positive MR diagnoses.

Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament • knee • meniscal tear • meniscus • sports medicine • trauma


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.