AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hargaden, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by McKee, G. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hargaden, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by McKee, G. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2479
AJR 2008; 191:359-363
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Clinical Observations

Analysis of the Mammographic and Sonographic Features of Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia

Gormlaith C. Hargaden1,2, Eren D. Yeh1,3, Dianne Georgian-Smith1,3, Richard H. Moore1, Elizabeth A. Rafferty1, Elkan F. Halpern4 and Grace T. McKee5

1 Division of Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, Avon Comprehensive Breast Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
2 Present address: Breast Check, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, 36 Eccles St., Dublin 7, Ireland.
3 Present address: Division of Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
4 Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
5 Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to describe the imaging findings in 149 patients with pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH) who had undergone at least 4 years of clinical follow-up for detection of subsequent malignancy.

CONCLUSION. PASH is a common entity that presents with benign imaging features without evidence of subsequent malignant potential. At our institution, in the absence of suspicious features a diagnosis of PASH at core biopsy is considered sufficient, and surgical excision has been obviated.

Keywords: breast • mammography • pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia • sonography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.