HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME Commentary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Newhouse, J. H. Articles by Starren, J. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Newhouse, J. H. Articles by Starren, J. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Frequency of Serum Creatinine Changes in the Absence of Iodinated Contrast Material: Implications for Studies of Contrast Nephrotoxicity

¹ Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St., New York, NY 10032.
² Present address: Department of Radiology, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY.
³ Present address: Department of Radiology, Bridgeport Hospital, Bridgeport, CT.
⁴ Department of Medical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
⁵ Present address: Biomedical Informatics Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, WI.

OBJECTIVE. Most studies of contrast-induced nephropathy lack controls to distinguish it from nephropathy from other causes. We assessed the frequency and magnitude of serum creatinine changes in patients not receiving iodinated contrast material to compare with creatinine changes in publications regarding contrast nephropathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. From the electronic medical records of an academic medical center, adults with creatinine determinations on five consecutive days who had not received contrast material during the previous 10 days were identified. The first creatinine level was compared with those on subsequent days. We calculated the frequency with which these levels exceeded thresholds used to identify contrast nephropathy in previous publications.

RESULTS. Among 32,161 patients, more than half showed a change of at least 25% and more than two fifths, a change of at least 0.4 mg/dL. Among patients with baseline creatinine levels of 0.6–1.2 mg/dL, increases of at least 25%, 33%, and 50% occurred in 27%, 19%, and 11% of patients, respectively. Increases of 0.4, 0.6, and 1.0 mg/dL occurred in 13%, 7%, and 3% of patients. Among patients with baseline creatinine levels greater than 2.0 mg/dL, increases of at least 25%, 33%, and 50% occurred in 16%, 12%, and 7%. Increases of 0.4, 0.6, and 1.0 mg/dL occurred in 33%, 26%, and 18%. These increases were not different from the incidences of contrast nephropathy previously published.

CONCLUSION. The creatinine level increases in patients who are not receiving contrast material as often as it does in published series of patients who are receiving contrast material. The role of contrast material in nephropathy may have been overestimated.

Keywords: contrast material • iodinated contrast material • nephropathy • nephrotoxicity • renal failure

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A. Baumgarten and J. H. Ellis Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: Contrast Material Not Required? Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 383 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]