AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ladapo, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gazelle, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ladapo, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gazelle, G. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3611
AJR 2008; 191:455-463
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary MDCT in the Triage of Patients with Acute Chest Pain

Joseph A. Ladapo1, Udo Hoffmann2,3, Fabian Bamberg2, John T. Nagurney4, David M. Cutler5,6, Milton C. Weinstein7 and G. Scott Gazelle2,3,7,8

1 Harvard Ph.D. Program in Health Policy, 14 Story St., 4th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02138.
2 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
3 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
4 Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
5 Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
6 National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
7 Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
8 Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

OBJECTIVE. Patients at low risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who present to the emergency department complaining of acute chest pain place a substantial economic burden on the U.S. health care system. Noninvasive 64-MDCT coronary angiography may facilitate their triage, and we evaluated its cost-effectiveness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A microsimulation model was developed to compare costs and health effects of performing CT coronary angiography and either discharging, stress testing, or referring emergency department patients for invasive coronary angiography, depending on their severity of atherosclerosis, compared with a standard-of-care (SOC) algorithm that based management on biomarkers and stress tests alone.

RESULTS. Using CT coronary angiography to triage 55-year-old men with acute chest pain increased emergency department and hospital costs by $110 and raised total health care costs by $200. In 55-year-old women, the technology was cost-saving; emergency department and hospital costs decreased by $410, and total health care costs decreased by $380. Compared with the SOC, CT coronary angiography-based triage extended life expectancy by 10 days in men and by 6 days in women. This translated into corresponding improvements of 0.03 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and 0.01 QALYs, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for CT coronary angiography was $6,400 per QALY in men; in women, CT coronary angiography was cost-saving. Cost-effectiveness ratios were sensitive to several parameters but generally remained in the range of what is typically considered cost-effective.

CONCLUSION. CT coronary angiography-based triage for patients with low-risk chest pain is modestly more effective than the SOC. It is also cost-saving in women and associated with low cost-effectiveness ratios in men.

Keywords: acute chest pain • cardiac CT • cost-effectiveness • health policy • noninvasive angiography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Bastarrika, Y. S. Lee, W. Huda, B. Ruzsics, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf
CT of Coronary Artery Disease
Radiology, November 1, 2009; 253(2): 317 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
J. A. Ladapo, J. R. Horwitz, M. C. Weinstein, G. S. Gazelle, and D. M. Cutler
Adoption And Spread Of New Imaging Technology: A Case Study
Health Aff., November 1, 2009; 28(6): w1122 - w1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. S. S. Genders, W. B. Meijboom, M. F. L. Meijs, J. D. Schuijf, N. R. Mollet, A. C. Weustink, F. Pugliese, J. J. Bax, M. J. Cramer, G. P. Krestin, et al.
CT Coronary Angiography in Patients Suspected of Having Coronary Artery Disease: Decision Making from Various Perspectives in the Face of Uncertainty
Radiology, October 28, 2009; (2009) radiol.2533090507v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. Bastarrika, C. Thilo, G. F. Headden, P. L. Zwerner, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf
Cardiac CT in the Assessment of Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2009; 193(2): 397 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. J. Halpern
Triple-Rule-Out CT Angiography for Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain and Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome
Radiology, August 1, 2009; 252(2): 332 - 345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. M. May, W. P. Shuman, J. N. Strote, K. R. Branch, L. M. Mitsumori, D. W. Lockhart, and J. H. Caldwell
Low-Risk Patients With Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: Negative 64-MDCT Coronary Angiography May Reduce Length of Stay and Hospital Charges
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2009; 193(1): 150 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. C. McCulloch, S. Paulin, S. K. Gerard, G. Karthikeyan, G. Vorobiof, W. M. Fogarty Jr., J. A.C. Lima, J. M. Miller, the CORE 64 Investigators, J. Walsh, et al.
Coronary Angiography by 64-Row CT
N. Engl. J. Med., May 7, 2009; 360(19): 2027 - 2031.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
U. Hoffmann and F. Bamberg
Is Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool to Evaluate Patients With Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department?: CT Coronary Angiography Is the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool for Evaluating Patients Presenting With Chest Pain to the Emergency Department
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 251 - 263.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
R. C. Hendel
Is Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool to Evaluate Patients With Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department?: CT Coronary Angiography Is the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool for Evaluating Patients Presenting With Chest Pain to the Emergency Department: Antagonist Viewpoint
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 264 - 275.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.