AJR Custom publishing of AJR articles and ARRS Cat. Course
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bedi, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, K. K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bedi, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, K. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2460
AJR 2008; 191:646-652
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Cortical Morphologic Features of Axillary Lymph Nodes as a Predictor of Metastasis in Breast Cancer: In Vitro Sonographic Study

Deepak G. Bedi1, Rajesh Krishnamurthy2, Savitri Krishnamurthy3, Beth S. Edeiken1, Huong Le-Petross1, Bruno D. Fornage1, Roland L. Bassett, Jr.4 and Kelly K. Hunt5

1 Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1350, Houston, TX 77030.
2 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX.
3 Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
4 Division of Quantitative Sciences, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
5 Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was in vitro sonographic–pathologic correlation of findings in dissected axillary lymph nodes from breast cancer patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection and classification of the sonographic appearance of the nodes on the basis of cortical morphologic features to facilitate early recognition of metastatic disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. High-resolution sonography was used for in vitro examination of 171 lymph nodes from 19 axillae in 18 patients with unknown nodal status who underwent axillary lymph node dissection for early infiltrating breast cancer. The images were evaluated by two blinded observers, and discordant readings were referred to a third blinded observer. Each lymph node was classified as one of types 1–6 according to cortical morphologic features. Types 1–4 were considered benign, ranging from hyperechoic with no visible cortex to thickened generalized hypoechoic cortical lobulation. Type 5 (focal hypoechoic cortical lobulation) and type 6 (hypoechoic node with absent hilum) nodes were considered metastatic. The reference standard for metastatic disease was histopathologic evaluation of sectioned nodes by a single pathologist blinded to sonographic findings. Largest nodal diameter also was measured.

RESULTS. Interobserver agreement was 77% for classification of nodal morphology (types 1–6) and 88% for characterization of a node as benign or malignant. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of cortical shape in prediction of metastatic involvement of axillary nodes were 77%, 80%, 36%, 96%, and 80%. Type 4 nodes had the most false-negative findings (four of 36). Node size ranged from 0.2 to 3.8 cm, and subcentimeter nodes of all types were detected.

CONCLUSION. In breast cancer, axillary lymph nodes can be classified according to cortical morphologic features. Predominantly hyperechoic nodes (types 1–3) can be considered benign. Generalized cortical lobulation (type 4) is uncommonly a false-negative finding, but metastasis, if present, is invariably detected at sentinel node mapping. The presence of asymmetric focal hypoechoic cortical lobulation (type 5) or a completely hypoechoic node (type 6) should serve as a guideline for universal performance of fine-needle aspiration for preoperative staging of breast cancer. This classification, when verified with larger samples, may serve as a useful clinical guideline if proven with results of in vivo studies.

Keywords: breast cancer • nodal metastasis • nodal sonography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.