AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nathan, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Jarvik, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nathan, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Jarvik, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3466
AJR 2008; 191:1102-1106
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Therapeutic Impact of CT of the Appendix in a Community Hospital Emergency Department

Robert O. Nathan1,2, C. Craig Blackmore1,3 and Jeffrey G. Jarvik1

1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Ave., Box 359728, Seattle, WA 98104-2499.
2 Department of Radiology, Valley Medical Center, Renton, WA.
3 Department of Radiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the therapeutic impact of CT of the appendix in a community hospital.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. For each of 100 consecutive adult patients who presented to a community hospital emergency department from August 2006 to November 2006 and underwent CT of the appendix, the proposed treatment plan and the likelihood of appendicitis were recorded before CT and were compared with the actual treatment after CT. The primary outcome assessed was change in patient management after CT. The percentage likelihood of appendicitis, whether patient disposition changed after CT, and the presence or absence of appendicitis were examined. The accuracy of CT was also calculated.

RESULTS. The treatment plans of the emergency clinicians changed in 29 patients (29%). Appendicitis was ruled out on the basis of CT findings in 50% (9/18) of patients when appendicitis was considered probable and in 60% (3/5) when appendicitis was considered very likely. When appendicitis was considered unlikely, appendicitis was ruled out by CT in 100% (20/20) of patients. CT of the appendix was shown to have high sensitivity (94%), specificity (100%), positive predictive value (100%), negative predictive value (99%), and accuracy (99%).

CONCLUSION. CT of the appendix had an important therapeutic impact on patients presenting to a community hospital emergency department. The data suggest that CT can be withheld in patients in whom emergency clinicians rate the likelihood of appendicitis as unlikely but that CT findings are often of benefit even when appendicitis is judged to be very likely.

Keywords: abdominal imaging • appendicitis • CT • emergency radiology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. K. Chaudhuri and S. Fink
Therapeutic Impact of CT of the Appendix in a Community Hospital
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2009; 193(3): W255 - W255.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. O. Nathan, C. C. Blackmore, and J. G. Jarvik
Reply
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2009; 193(3): W256 - W256.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.