HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sosna, J. Articles by Blachar, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sosna, J. Articles by Blachar, A. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

CT Colonography: Positioning Order and Intracolonic Pressure

¹ Department of Radiology, Hadassah–Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein Kerem POB 12000, Jerusalem, Israel 91120.
² Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
³ Department of Radiology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effect of the order of positions on sustained rectal pressure and factors affecting pain perceived by patients during air-insufflated CT colonography.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Rectal pressure was measured in the supine and prone positions for CT colonography of 379 patients in two groups. One hundred seventy-seven patients underwent imaging supine and then prone, and 202 patients were prone and then supine. Insufflation and patient pain parameters were based on patient self-report and investigator visualization of observable indicators. Colonic distention, residual feces or fluid, and diverticulosis were evaluated with a semiquantitative scoring system. Fisher's exact, Student's t, and chi-square tests as well as multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS. Pressure was higher in the prone than in the supine position in both groups (p < 0.001). The measured pressure in the initial position did not differ between groups (p = 0.88). Pressure increased from 38.3 to 40.07 mm Hg in the second position in the supine-first group and decreased from 38.3 to 32.25 mm Hg in the second position in the prone-first group (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with pain in the second position was 40% in the supine-first group compared with 18% in the prone-first group (p < 0.003). Distention did not differ between the groups. Pain was associated with increased pressure and diverticulosis (p < 0.001) but not with retained feces or fluid.

CONCLUSION. Sustained pressure in the air-insufflated colon was higher in the prone than in the supine position. Imaging in the prone position first results in a significant decrease in pressure in the latter phase and less pain. Pain was associated with pressure and diverticulosis.

Keywords: CT colonography • diverticulosis • pain • position • pressure

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?