HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Redondo, M. V. Articles by Domenech, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Redondo, M. V. Articles by Domenech, E. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

MR Arthrography of the Shoulder Using an Anterior Approach: Optimal Injection Site

¹ Department of Radiology, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, 30120-El Palmar, Murcia, Spain.
² Department of Radiation Protection, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain.
³ Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain.
⁴ Department of Biostatistics, Murcia University, Murcia, Spain.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to optimize anterior MR arthrography of the shoulder by comparing three injection sites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventy-eight patients were divided into three groups of 26 each, according to the injection site selected: the upper third of the medial part of the humeral head, the lower third of the medial part of the humeral head, or the area between the middle and lower thirds of the glenohumeral joint. A marker plate with radiopaque coordinates was used in performing the technique. Radiologist time and exposure time were recorded, and the intensity of the patient's pain was measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Groups were compared using variance analysis and the least significant difference method.

RESULTS. Shoulder arthrography was considered satisfactory for all three injection sites. Mean exposure time was 20.9 ± 7.8 (SD) milliseconds, and mean radiologist time was 6.4 ± 0.8 minutes. Mean pain intensity registered by the VAS was 1.7 ± 0.9, the lowest values tending to be those recorded by patients who received an injection in the upper third. Exposure and radiologist times were lower for these latter patients; differences between the upper third and the other two areas were statistically significant (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSION. The optimal injection site for anterior MR arthrography of the shoulder is the upper third of the humeral head, a simple, rapid procedure that is well tolerated by patients and reduces the radiation dose administered.

Keywords: arthrography • joint • shoulder

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?