AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hiwatashi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hiwatashi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.1086
AJR 2008; 191:1401-1405
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Usefulness of Cone-Beam CT Before and After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty

Akio Hiwatashi1, Takashi Yoshiura, Tomoyuki Noguchi, Osamu Togao, Koji Yamashita, Hironori Kamano and Hiroshi Honda

1 All authors: Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. The usefulness of cone-beam C-arm CT for percutaneous vertebroplasty has not been fully evaluated. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of cone-beam CT for evaluation before and after vertebroplasty.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This prospective study included 22 consecutive patients (15 women and seven men) with osteoporotic compression fractures (51 vertebrae). Cone-beam CT and 64-MDCT were performed before and after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Multiplanar reformations of the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes were obtained. We evaluated the presence of cortical defects, vacuum phenomena in adjacent disks, and cement leakage, and we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of cone-beam CT compared with MDCT.

RESULTS. All 75 cortical defects in 51 vertebrae seen on MDCT were also observed on cone-beam CT (100% sensitivity and specificity). Vacuum phenomena were detected in 33 of 86 (38.4%) adjacent disk spaces on MDCT and in 29 on cone-beam CT (84.8% sensitivity, 98.1% specificity, and 93.0% accuracy). Cement leakage was noted at 17 disk spaces, 15 paravertebral soft tissues, and 12 veins on MDCT. All cement leakages were correctly identified on cone-beam CT.

CONCLUSION. Cone-beam CT is able to correctly evaluate for vertebral fractures and vacuum phenomena in adjacent disks before vertebroplasty and for cement leakage after vertebroplasty.

Keywords: compression fractures • cone-beam CT • osteoporosis • percutaneous vertebroplasty • thoracolumbar junction • vertebral body


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.