AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsalafoutas, I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Papailiou, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsalafoutas, I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Papailiou, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.1030
AJR 2008; 191:1601-1607
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Comparison of Measured and Calculated Skin Doses in CT-Guided Interventional Procedures

Ioannis A. Tsalafoutas1, Virginia Tsapaki2, Charikleia Triantopoulou3, Christina Pouli3, Virginia Kouridou1, Ioanna Fagadaki3 and John Papailiou3

1 Medical Physics Department, Agios Savvas Hospital, 171 Alexandras Ave., Athens 115 22, Greece.
2 Medical Physics Unit, Konstantopoulio Hospital, Athens, Greece.
3 Computed Tomography Department, Konstantopoulio Hospital, Athens, Greece.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to compare theoretic estimations of the dose to the patient's skin during CT-guided interventional procedures with measurements performed using radiation therapy verification films.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. In each of the 12 interventions studied, a Kodak EDR2 film was positioned under the patient's anatomic area of concern. After processing, each film was scanned with a medical-grade scanner to produce a digital image from which the gray-scale profiles were obtained using the appropriate software. From these data and respective data from a series of calibration films, the entrance skin dose (ESD) profiles were derived. These ESD profiles were compared with the ESD profiles produced using a theoretic model and its revised version, which utilizes the DICOM data of each slice (i.e., tube potential, tube loading, slice thickness, slice location, pitch, and table height) and air-kerma output measurements from the CT tube.

RESULTS. In general, the ESD profiles calculated using the revised theoretic method were in better agreement with the profiles derived from the verification films than the ESD profiles derived from the original theoretic method. The deviations from the peak skin doses (PSDs) derived from the digital film images were within –3% and 27% of the PSDs derived from the verification films. The respective deviations of the ESD profiles calculated with the original theoretic method were quite larger.

CONCLUSION. The theoretic model provides a useful tool for estimating skin doses during CT-guided interventions with a reasonable level of accuracy. With further refinement and a little automation this method could be implemented for daily use.

Keywords: CT guidance • entrance skin dose • interventional procedures • medical physics • peak skin dose • radiation dose


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.