AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, B.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, B.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2827
AJR 2008; 191:1798-1804
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Outcome of MRI-Guided Breast Biopsy

Boo-Kyung Han1,2, Mitchell D. Schnall1, Susan G. Orel1 and Mark Rosen1

1 Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.
2 Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to investigate the outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy as a function of the indication for MRI and the MRI features of the lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. In 154 women (mean age, 51 years) with 172 MRI-detected lesions, MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy was attempted. Using the original radiologic report, we evaluated the indication for the original MRI examination and the MRI findings that led to biopsy. We investigated the core and operative histology results and follow-up data. We analyzed the cancer rate as a function of the indication for MRI and the MRI features of the lesions using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS. In 22 of the 172 lesions (13%), MRI-guided biopsy was deferred due to decreased visualization or nonvisualization of the MRI finding that led to biopsy. Of 150 biopsies in 134 women, core histology revealed 39 malignant (39/150, 26%), 90 benign (90/150, 60%), and 21 high-risk (21/150, 14%) lesions. Through operative histology (n = 13) or follow-up (n = 30), four high-risk lesions were upgraded to malignancy and all deferred lesions except four lost to follow-up were confirmed to be benign. The final number of malignancies was 43 (29%) including 16 in situ and 27 invasive cancers. The probability of malignancy was different in the screening and diagnostic settings (14% vs 36%, respectively; p = 0.05), whereas it was not different according to lesion type (mass, 34%; nonmass, 27%; focus, 19%; p > 0.05) or kinetics (persistent, 23%; plateau, 31%; washout, 29%; p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION. The cancer rate in our cohort of women who underwent MRI-guided breast biopsy was 29%. It varied according to the indication for the original MRI examination, but not according to the MRI features of the lesions.

Keywords: breast biopsy • breast neoplasms • diagnostic imaging • MRI-guided biopsy • vacuum-assisted biopsy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S. Nakano, M. Yoshida, K. Fujii, K. Yorozuya, Y. Mouri, J. Kousaka, T. Fukutomi, J. Kimura, T. Ishiguchi, K. Ohno, et al.
Fusion of MRI and Sonography Image for Breast Cancer Evaluation Using Real-time Virtual Sonography with Magnetic Navigation: First Experience
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2009; 39(9): 552 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.