HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lee, I. S. Articles by Kang, H. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lee, I. S. Articles by Kang, H. S. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Microscopy Coil for Preoperative MRI of Small Soft-Tissue Masses of the Hand and Foot: Comparison with Conventional Surface Coil

¹ Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumidong, Bundang-Gu, Seong Nam, Gyeongi-Do, 463-707 Korea.
² Department of Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
³ Present address: Department of Radiology, Pusan National University College of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.
⁴ Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeongi-Do, Korea.
⁵ Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeongi-Do, Korea.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of MRI performed with a microscopy coil in the preoperative evaluation of small soft-tissue masses of the hand and foot.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixteen patients with clinically suspected soft-tissue masses of the hand or foot underwent MRI with both a conventional surface coil and a microscopy coil and were included in this study. All MR images were obtained with a 1.5-T system and a 47-mm microscopy coil. MR images were qualitatively analyzed for size, number, location, morphologic details, extent and margin quality, and growth pattern of the mass and the relation between the mass and adjacent anatomic structures. For quantitative analysis, we measured the signal-to-noise ratio of each mass on MR images obtained with both coils. MRI findings with the two coils were compared, and the findings were correlated with the surgical and histopathologic findings on all 16 patients who underwent surgery.

RESULTS. Relation between adjacent anatomic structures and the mass (n = 15), internal morphologic features (n = 14), and extent or margin quality (n = 11) of masses were clearly delineated on MRI performed with a microscopy coil (p = 0.0001). These findings correlated well with the surgical and pathologic findings. In addition, small soft-tissue masses not detected with a conventional surface coil were readily detected with a microscopy coil (n = 3). The signal-to-noise ratios of masses detected with a microscopy coil were significantly higher than those of masses detected with a conventional surface coil (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION. MRI with a microscopy coil was useful in the preoperative assessment of small soft-tissue masses of the hand and foot.

Keywords: fingers • hand • MRI • MRI surface coil • MRI technology • neoplasm • toes

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?