AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hurwitz, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson-Evans, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hurwitz, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson-Evans, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.1066
AJR 2009; 192:244-253
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Radiation Dose Savings for Adult Pulmonary Embolus 64-MDCT Using Bismuth Breast Shields, Lower Peak Kilovoltage, and Automatic Tube Current Modulation

Lynne M. Hurwitz1, Terry T. Yoshizumi1, Philip C. Goodman1, Rendon C. Nelson1, Greta Toncheva1, Giao B. Nguyen1, Carolyn Lowry1 and Colin Anderson-Evans1

1 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess whether radiation dose savings using a lower peak kilovoltage (kVp) setting, bismuth breast shields, and automatic tube current modulation could be achieved while preserving the image quality of MDCT scans obtained to assess for pulmonary embolus (PE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS. CT angiography (CTA) examinations were performed to assess for the presence or absence of pulmonary artery emboli using a 64-MDCT scanner with automatic tube current modulation (noise level = 10 HU), two kVp settings (120 and 140 kVp), and bismuth breast shields. Absorbed organ doses were measured using anthropomorphic phantoms and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) detectors. Image quality was assessed quantitatively as well as qualitatively in various anatomic sites of the thorax.

RESULTS. Using a lower kVp (120 vs 140 kVp) and automatic tube current modulation resulted in a dose savings of 27% to the breast and 47% to the lungs. The use of a lower kVp (120 kVp), automatic tube current modulation, and bismuth shields placed directly on the anterior chest wall reduced absorbed breast and lung doses by 55% and 45%, respectively. Qualitative assessment of the images showed no change in image quality of the lungs and mediastinum when using a lower kVp, bismuth shields, or both.

CONCLUSION. The use of bismuth breast shields together with a lower kVp and automatic tube current modulation will reduce the absorbed radiation dose to the breast and lungs without degradation of image quality to the organs of the thorax for CTA detection of PE.

Keywords: bismuth breast shields • chest imaging protocol • MDCT angiography • pulmonary embolus • radiation dose


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
E. Belmaati, C. Jensen, K. F. Kofoed, M. Iversen, I. Steffensen, and M. B. Nielsen
Primary graft dysfunction; possible evaluation by high resolution computed tomography, and suggestions for a scoring system
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, November 1, 2009; 9(5): 859 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Angel, N. Yaghmai, C. M. Jude, J. J. DeMarco, C. H. Cagnon, J. G. Goldin, C. H. McCollough, A. N. Primak, D. D. Cody, D. M. Stevens, et al.
Dose to Radiosensitive Organs During Routine Chest CT: Effects of Tube Current Modulation
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2009; 193(5): 1340 - 1345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E.J. Lee, S.K. Lee, R. Agid, P. Howard, J.M. Bae, and K. terBrugge
Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose between Fixed Tube Current and Combined Automatic Tube Current Modulation in Craniocervical CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2009; 30(9): 1754 - 1759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. A. Jaffe, T. T. Yoshizumi, G. Toncheva, C. Anderson-Evans, C. Lowry, C. M. Miller, R. C. Nelson, and C. E. Ravin
Radiation Dose for Body CT Protocols: Variability of Scanners at One Institution
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2009; 193(4): 1141 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.