HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chang, W. Articles by Mirvis, S. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chang, W. Articles by Mirvis, S. E. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Diagnostic Determinants of Craniocervical Distraction Injury in Adults

¹ Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S Greene St., N2W78, Baltimore, MD 21201.
² National Study Center for Trauma and Emergency Medical Systems, Baltimore, MD 21201.

OBJECTIVE. Craniocervical distraction injury is a class of injuries that involve the skull base, the atlas, and the axis. Although these injuries often are overt imaging and clinical findings, the injury can be masked during unreliable physical examinations and difficult to identify during diagnostic imaging. The goal of this study was to identify on coronal and sagittal CT multiplanar reformations precise measurements and qualitative relations between anatomic landmarks that can help in establishing the diagnosis of craniocervical distraction injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We performed a retrospective review of the cases of 35 patients with craniocervical distraction injury admitted to our trauma center from 2000 to 2006. Two independent radiologists made several qualitative and quantitative anatomic assessments on reformatted CT images through the craniocervical junctions (skull base through C2) of the 35 patients and of 50 other patients sustaining blunt trauma who were discharged without findings of cervical spinal injury. Logistic regression, recursive partitioning, and multivariate analysis were performed in an attempt to find measurements that differentiated the groups.

RESULTS. Among the patients with craniocervical distraction injury, statistically significant positive correlations were found in several measurements, including midline occiput-C1 spinolaminar distance (p = 0.0016), midline C1-C2 spinolaminar distance (p < 0.0001), basion-dens distance (p < 0.0001), sum of condylar displacement (p = 0.0002), and basion-posterior axial line distance (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION. Several quantitative parameters on sagittal and coronal multiplanar CT reformations can be used to differentiate patients with craniocervical distraction injury from patients without this injury.

Keywords: atlas • axis • CT • craniocervical distraction injuries • spine • trauma

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?