AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dick, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Elmore, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dick, J. F., III
Right arrow Articles by Elmore, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3346
AJR 2009; 192:327-333
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Predictors of Radiologists' Perceived Risk of Malpractice Lawsuits in Breast Imaging

John F. Dick, III1, Thomas H. Gallagher2, R. James Brenner3, Joyce P. Yi2, Lisa M. Reisch2, Linn Abraham4, Diana L. Miglioretti4, Patricia A. Carney5, Gary R. Cutter6 and Joann G. Elmore2,7

1 Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH.
2 Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, 325 Ninth Ave., Box 359780, Seattle, WA 98104.
3 Bay Imaging Consultants, Oakland CA.
4 Group Health Center for Health Studies, Seattle, WA.
5 Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
6 Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
7 Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Seattle, WA.

OBJECTIVE. The shortage of radiologists in breast imaging may be related to heightened malpractice lawsuit concerns. Our objective was to examine radiologists' reported experiences and perceptions of future lawsuit risk and explore personal and professional factors that may be associated with elevated perceptions of risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Radiologists who routinely interpret mammography examinations in diverse regions of the United States (Washington, Colorado, and New Hampshire) completed a mailed survey in 2002 and 2006, including questions on demographics, practice characteristics, and medicolegal experience and perceptions as well as a validated scale measuring reactions to uncertainty in clinical situations. A survey assessing the radiologists' work facilities was also completed in 2002.

RESULTS. Participation by eligible radiologists was 77% (139 of 181) in 2002 and 71% (84 of 118) in 2006. The percentage of radiologists reporting malpractice claims related to mammography in the previous 5 years was 8% on the 2002 survey and 10% on the 2006 survey. Radiologists' mean estimate of the probability of being sued for malpractice in the next 5 years (41% in 2002 and 35% in 2006) was markedly higher than the actual reported risk. Radiologists' age, sex, clinical experience, and workload were not associated with a higher perceived risk of being sued. Radiologists who reported higher perceived risk of lawsuits were more likely to have experienced a prior malpractice claim, to report knowing colleagues with prior lawsuits, and to score higher on a scale measuring anxiety caused by uncertainty in clinical situations. Radiologists working at facilities that did not use double reading reported higher perceived risk, but the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION. Radiologists working in breast imaging substantially overestimate their risk of a future malpractice lawsuit. Radiologists with higher risk perceptions show more negative reactions to uncertainty in a clinical setting. Understanding that their actual risk of malpractice lawsuits may be substantially lower than anticipated may help reduce radiologists' fears and alleviate the manpower shortage in mammography. Programs to address the shortage of breast imagers could be targeted toward radiologists with heightened malpractice lawsuit concerns.

Keywords: mammography • medical malpractice risk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Berlin
The Mea Culpa Conundrum
Radiology, November 1, 2009; 253(2): 284 - 287.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. H. Gallagher, A. J. Cook, R. J. Brenner, P. A. Carney, D. L. Miglioretti, B. M. Geller, K. Kerlikowske, T. L. Onega, R. D. Rosenberg, B. C. Yankaskas, et al.
Disclosing Harmful Mammography Errors to Patients
Radiology, November 1, 2009; 253(2): 443 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Berlin
Malpractice and Breast Cancer: Perceptions Versus Reality
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2009; 192(2): 334 - 336.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.