AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hur, J.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hur, J.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, B. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.1366
AJR 2009; 192:629-634
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Diagnostic Accuracy of CT Fluoroscopy–Guided Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Ground-Glass Opacity Pulmonary Lesions

Jin Hur1, Hye-Jeong Lee1, Ji Eun Nam1, Young Jin Kim1, Tae Hoon Kim1, Kyu Ok Choe1 and Byoung Wook Choi1

1 All authors: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 250 Seongsanno (134 Sinchon-dong), Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, South Korea.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT fluoroscopy–guided percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy of ground-glass opacity (GGO) pulmonary lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-eight patients with GGO lesions who underwent CT fluoroscopy–guided needle aspiration biopsy were enrolled in this study. GGO lesions were divided into three groups according to their size: group 1, lesions ≤ 10 mm (n = 10); group 2, lesions 11–20 mm (n = 10); and group 3, lesions > 20 mm (n = 8). Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated on the basis of 28 needle aspiration biopsy results and were compared among the three groups using Fisher's exact test. Diagnostic accuracy was also compared according to length of needle path (< 5 cm vs 5–9 cm vs > 9 cm) and GGO component (50–90% vs > 90%). Each case was reviewed for complications, which included pneumothorax, thoracostomy tube insertion, and hemoptysis.

RESULTS. There were 17 (61%) malignant and 11 (39%) benign lesions. Three (10%) biopsy results were nondiagnostic, all of which were confirmed as benign. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT fluoroscopy–guided needle aspiration biopsy for diagnosing GGO were 67%, 100%, and 80% in group 1; 71%, 100%, and 80% in group 2; and 75%, 100%, and 88% in group 3. The diagnostic accuracy of CT fluoroscopy–guided needle aspiration biopsy for diagnosing GGO was not significantly different among the three groups (p > 0.05). The diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different according to the length of the needle path (p > 0.05). However, diagnostic accuracy was significantly more accurate in mixed GGO lesions than in pure GGO lesions (p = 0.046). Five patients (18%) developed a pneumothorax, two of whom (7%) required placement of a thoracostomy tube. Mild hemoptysis occurred in three patients (11%).

CONCLUSION. CT fluoroscopy–guided needle aspiration biopsy is a useful diagnostic technique for GGO pulmonary lesions and has an acceptable complication rate, even for small and deeply located lesions. The diagnostic accuracy is influenced by the GGO component.

Keywords: CT • fluoroscopy • ground-glass opacity • pulmonary lesions


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.