AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow VIDEO
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scheffel, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schertler, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scheffel, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schertler, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.1694
AJR 2009; 192:639-645
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Atrial Myxomas and Thrombi: Comparison of Imaging Features on CT

Hans Scheffel1, Stephan Baumueller1, Paul Stolzmann1, Sebastian Leschka1, André Plass2, Hatem Alkadhi1 and Thomas Schertler1

1 Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Medical Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistr. 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
2 Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to compare the imaging features of atrial myxomas and thrombi using CT and to assess the accuracy of CT for determining the origin of myxomas in comparison with surgical findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. From July 2006 until June 2008, 23 patients (15 women, eight men; mean age, 63 ± 14 years) with atrial myxomas (n = 13) and thrombi (n = 11) who underwent dual-source CT coronary angiography were included in this retrospective study. Two independent and blinded readers evaluated quantitative (CT attenuation and size) and qualitative (location, origin, shape, mobility, prolapse, and calcifications) parameters at CT. The shape and origin of myxomas were compared with the findings at surgery.

RESULTS. No significant differences regarding the CT attenuation of myxomas in comparison with thrombi were found (43 ± 14 HU vs 57 ± 30 HU; p = 0.23). Myxomas were significantly larger than thrombi (33 ± 16 mm vs 21 ± 7 mm; p < 0.05). The lesions were found equally in the left and right atria (p = 0.11). The origin (p < 0.001), shape (p < 0.05), mobility (p < 0.01), and occurrence of prolapse (p < 0.01) differed significantly between the lesions. Calcifications did not differ between the lesions (p = 0.2). In comparison with surgery, the origin of myxomas was correctly evaluated by CT in 11 of 13 patients (fossa ovalis, n = 5; interatrial septum, n = 4; and lateral atrial wall, n = 2), whereas CT misclassified the origin of two myxomas (posterior and lateral wall left atria at CT vs fossa ovalis at surgery).

CONCLUSION. Atrial myxomas and thrombi can be differentiated by their distinguishing features of size, origin, shape, mobility, and prolapse. CT is accurate in determining the origin of myxomas but may fail in some cases.

Keywords: cardiac myxomas • cardiac thrombi • CT • heart


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.