AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Babb, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Babb, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.1572
AJR 2009; 192:W103-W110
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Original Research

CT Diagnosis of Mucocele of the Appendix in Patients with Acute Appendicitis

Genevieve L. Bennett1, Teerath P. Tanpitukpongse1, Michael Macari1, Kyunghee C. Cho1 and James S. Babb1

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, 560 First Ave., Ste. HW 202, New York, NY 10016.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to identify the CT features of mucocele of the appendix coexisting with acute appendicitis and to determine whether this entity can be differentiated from acute appendicitis without mucocele.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. CT scans of 70 patients (12 with acute appendicitis with mucocele, 29 with acute appendicitis without mucocele, 29 with a normal appendix) were retrospectively interpreted by two readers. The appendix was evaluated for maximal luminal diameter, cystic dilatation, luminal attenuation, appendicolith, mural calcification and enhancement, periappendiceal fat stranding, fluid, and lymphadenopathy. CT findings were compared by use of Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic utility of appendiceal luminal diameter in differentiating acute appendicitis with from that without coexisting mucocele.

RESULTS. Cystic dilatation of the appendix and maximal luminal diameter achieved statistical significance (p < 0.05) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with mucocele. Mural calcification achieved statistical significance for one reader (p = 0.0049) and a statistical trend for the other (p < 0.1). A maximal luminal diameter greater than 1.3 cm had a sensitivity of 71.4%, specificity of 94.6%, and overall diagnostic accuracy of 88.2% for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with mucocele.

CONCLUSION. Although there is overlap with acute appendicitis without mucocele, CT features suggestive of coexisting mucocele in patients with acute appendicitis include cystic dilatation of the appendix, mural calcification, and a luminal diameter greater than 1.3 cm.

Keywords: acute appendicitis • appendix • CT • mucocele


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.