AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brodoefel, H.
Right arrow Articles by Clouse, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brodoefel, H.
Right arrow Articles by Clouse, M. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.1381
AJR 2009; 192:W84-W89
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Coronary Plaque Quantification by Voxel Analysis: Dual-Source MDCT Angiography Versus Intravascular Sonography

Harald Brodoefel1,2, Christof Burgstahler3, Adeel Sabir1, Chun-Shan Yam1, Faisal Khosa1, Claus D. Claussen2 and Melvin E. Clouse1

1 Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave., WCC-302, Boston, MA 02215.
2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany.
3 Department of Cardiology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a voxel-based analytic technique for quantification of noncalcified coronary artery plaque with intravascular sonography as a standard of reference.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Intravascular sonography and dual-source MDCT angiography prospectively performed on 12 patients resulted in identification of 20 segments containing noncalcified plaque. Four of these segments were used to establish reference measurements of 0.6-mm proximal wall thickness with a 0-HU cutoff between the epicardial fat and outer wall and an individually adjusted threshold for the interface between the wall and lumen. With these data, consecutive circular layers of the outer wall were subtracted from a 3D volume to determine the plaque plus medial layer and the actual plaque volume in the other 16 segments. Accuracy of the voxel technique was assessed by comparing the results with intravascular sonographic findings.

RESULTS. Both the total plaque burden (plaque plus medial layer) and the actual plaque volume had good concordance with intravascular sonographic findings (49.6 ± 20 mm 3 vs 56.7 ± 23.6 mm 3, p = 0.076; 26.5 ± 14.8 mm 3 vs 30.9 ± 15.3 mm 3, p = 0.09). Corresponding correlation coefficients were r = 0.76 and r = 0.79. The method had good reproducibility, the an intraclass correlation coefficients being 0.93 for total plaque burden and 0.90 for actual plaque volume.

CONCLUSION. Voxel analysis can be used for accurate and reproducible quantification not only of plaque burden but also of actual plaque volume.

Keywords: dual-source CT • intravascular sonography • MDCT angiography • plaque burden • voxel analysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.