AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joemai, R. M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Geleijns, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Joemai, R. M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Geleijns, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.1765
AJR 2009; 192:881-886
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Assessment of Patient and Occupational Dose in Established and New Applications of MDCT Fluoroscopy

Raoul M. S. Joemai1, Dirk Zweers1, Wim R. Obermann1 and Jacob Geleijns1

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Leiden, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE. This study aimed to assess patient dose and occupational dose in established and new applications of MDCT fluoroscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Electronic personal dosimeters were used to measure occupational dose equivalent. Effective patient dose was derived from the recorded dose–length product. Acquisition parameters that were observed during CT fluoroscopy (CTF) provided the basis for the estimation of an entrance skin dose profile. Two hundred ten CT-guided interventional procedures were included in the study.

RESULTS. The median effective patient dose was 10 mSv (range, 0.1–235 mSv; 107 procedures). The median peak entrance skin dose was 0.4 Sv (0.1–2.1 Sv; 27 procedures). From 547 measurements of occupational dose equivalent, a median occupational effective dose of 3 µSv per procedure was derived for the interventional radiologists and 0.4 µSv per procedure for the assisting radiologists and radiology technologists. The estimated maximum occupational effective dose reached 0.4 mSv.

CONCLUSION. The study revealed high effective patient doses, up to 235 mSv, mainly for relatively new applications such as CTF-guided radiofrequency ablations using MDCT, vertebroplasty, and percutaneous ethanol injections of tumors. Entrance doses were occasionally in the range of the warning level for deterministic skin effects but were always below the threshold for serious deterministic effects. The complexity of the procedure, expected benefits of the treatment, and general health state of the patient contribute to the justification of observed high effective patient doses.

Keywords: MDCT fluoroscopy • occupational radiation dose • patient radiation dose • radiation safety


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.