HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnson, P. T. Articles by Fishman, E. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Johnson, P. T. Articles by Fishman, E. K. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

MDCT for Suspected Appendicitis: Effect of Reconstruction Section Thickness on Diagnostic Accuracy, Rate of Appendiceal Visualization, and Reader Confidence Using Axial Images

¹ All authors: The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St., Baltimore, MD 21287.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate interpretative performance with different MDCT reconstruction parameters in adult patients with suspected appendicitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. MDCT scans of 212 adult patients obtained in an emergency department with a 64-MDCT scanner were prospectively collected. Acquisition technique included 24 x 1.2 mm detector configuration and IV contrast administration with or without oral contrast administration. Data sets were reconstructed with three techniques: 5 x 5 mm, 3 x 3 mm, and 2 x 1 mm (section thickness x interval). Each of the 212 sets of images (grouped by reconstruction technique) was reviewed retrospectively using axial sections by two independent readers blinded to diagnosis. Medical record review was conducted to identify patients with appendicitis. Visualization of the appendix, confidence in visualization, confidence for presence or absence of specific CT findings, diagnostic accuracy, and diagnostic confidence were compared across reconstruction techniques. Data were analyzed with simple and ordinal logistic regression with adjustment for multiple observations derived from each patient and for reader differences.

RESULTS. Progressively thinner reconstruction section thickness was associated with a significant increase in the rate of visualization of the appendix (p < 0.001 for 5 x 5 vs 3 x 3; p = 0.03 for 3 x 3 vs 2 x 1), visualization confidence (p < 0.001 for 5 x 5 vs 3 x 3 and 3 x 3 vs 2 x 1), and confidence for presence or absence of findings. Seventeen subjects (8%) had appendicitis. Correctness of diagnosis was not significantly associated with reconstruction method. However, for correctly diagnosed cases interpreted as normal, impression confidence increased with progressively thinner section thickness (p < 0.001 for 5 x 5 vs 3 x 3 and 3 x 3 vs 2 x 1).

CONCLUSION. In this investigation of contrast-enhanced MDCT of the appendix, visual ization of the appendix and confidence in interpretation of axial images progressively improved with use of thinner reconstruction sections.

Keywords: adults • appendicitis • appendix • CT • MDCT • technique

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?