HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Webb, M. Articles by Oren, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Webb, M. Articles by Oren, R. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Diagnostic Value of a Computerized Hepatorenal Index for Sonographic Quantification of Liver Steatosis

¹ Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizman St., Tel Aviv 64239, Israel.
² Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
³ Department of Pathology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

OBJECTIVE. Quantification of liver steatosis is clinically relevant in various liver diseases but cannot be done by conventional sonography, which only provides a qualitative assessment with significant observer variability. The aim of this study was to assess sonography as an objective tool for the quantification of liver steatosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Files of 111 patients with chronic liver disease who were referred for sonographically guided liver biopsy were collected. A hepatorenal sonographic index was calculated on the basis of the ratio between the echogenicity of the liver and that of the right kidney cortex using histogram echo intensity. Liver steatosis was graded by histology.

RESULTS. A significant correlation was found between histologic steatosis and the hepatorenal sonographic index (r = 0.82, p < 0.001). The validity of the hepatorenal sonographic index for the diagnosis of fatty liver was compared with liver biopsies with a steatosis level > 5%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 99.2% (95% CI, 98–100%). The optimal hepatorenal sonographic index cutoff point for the prediction of steatosis > 5% was 1.49, with sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 91%. The optimal hepatorenal sonographic index cutoff point for the prediction of steatosis 25% was 1.86, with sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 90%. The optimal hepatorenal sonographic index cutoff point for the prediction of steatosis 60% was 2.23, with sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 93%.

CONCLUSION. The hepatorenal sonographic index is a sensitive noninvasive method for steatosis quantification. It can diagnose small amounts of liver fat that would be missed by conventional sonography. It is reproducible and operator independent and can serve as an efficient tool to follow patients with steatosis and evaluate the efficacy of new treatment techniques.

Keywords: hepatorenal index • liver steatosis • quantification • sonography

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?