AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kandpal, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kapoor, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kandpal, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kapoor, K. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.1260
AJR 2009; 192:915-922
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Original Research

Respiratory-Triggered Versus Breath-Hold Diffusion-Weighted MRI of Liver Lesions: Comparison of Image Quality and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values

Harsh Kandpal1, Raju Sharma1, K. S. Madhusudhan1 and Kulwant Singh Kapoor2

1 Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, India.
2 Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to compare respiratory-triggered and breath-hold diffusion-weighted liver MRI and to assess the agreement in the apparent diffusion co-efficient (ADC) values between the two sequences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty-eight patients (27 men, 21 women; mean age, 45.2 years) with focal liver lesions underwent respiratory-triggered and breath-hold diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in addition to routine MRI. Both sequences had identical imaging parameters except for signal averages, which were 6 in respiratory-triggered and 2 in breath-hold sequences. A total of 92 lesions (maximum of three lesions per patient; 37 benign, 55 malignant) were evaluated. Lesions were confirmed by typical imaging appearance, histopathology, or follow-up. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and relative contrast ratio of the lesions were measured in each DWI sequence and were statistically compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The ADC values of normal liver and each category of liver lesions in the two sequences were compared for agreement using Pearson's coefficient and reliability analysis scale.

RESULTS. The SNR of the normal liver was significantly better on respiratory-triggered DWI than on breath-hold DWI. The mean CNR of metastases, hepatocellular carcinomas, and abscesses was significantly better in the respiratory-triggered DWI than in the breath-hold DWI sequences. The ADC values of liver and focal lesions measured by the two techniques showed good agreement. The SDs of the ADC values of normal liver were similar in the two sequences.

CONCLUSION. Respiratory-triggered DWI should be preferred over breath-hold DWI for the evaluation of focal liver lesions because it provides better image quality and SNR without any compromise in the calculated ADC values.

Keywords: comparison • diffusion-weighted MRI • lesions • liver


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.