HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME VIDEOS Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fritz, J. Articles by Pereira, P. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fritz, J. Articles by Pereira, P. L. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Freehand Real-Time MRI-Guided Lumbar Spinal Injection Procedures at 1.5 T: Feasibility, Accuracy, and Safety

¹ Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287.
² Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that freehand real-time MRI-guided lumbar spinal injection procedures are feasible, accurate, and safe when performed with a clinical open-bore 1.5-T MRI system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective analysis was made of spinal injection procedures performed over an 18-month period. Forty-nine procedures were performed on 37 patients (23 women, 14 men; mean age, 36 years; range, 18–48 years). A rapid FLASH 2D MRI sequence (TR/TE, 9.3/3.5; slice thickness, 5 mm; acquisition time, 1 second) was used for real-time needle placement with freehand technique. Data assessed were type of procedure, qualitative and quantitative image quality, dimensions of needle artifact, rate of successful drug delivery, rate of vascular uptake, time requirements, and occurrence of complications.

RESULTS. Among the 49 procedures, 22 (45%) were nerve root injections, 18 (37%) were facet joint injections, and nine (18%) were epidural injections. The quality of real-time FLASH 2D MR images was sufficient in all cases. Contrast-to-noise ratios were sufficiently high for good delineation of relevant structures. The needle artifact made was remarkably constant with an average overestimation of length of 1.0 ± 0.2 [SD] mm. Drug delivery was successful in all selective nerve root injections and epidural injections. The rate of successful drug delivery was 89% (16 of 18) for facet joint injections. No complete intravascular injections occurred. The mean table time was 36 minutes (range, 23–75 minutes). The mean real-time MRI time was 38 seconds (range, 12–185 seconds). No major complications occurred.

CONCLUSION. We accept the hypothesis that freehand real-time MRI-guided lumbar spinal injection procedures are feasible, accurate, and safe when performed with a clinical open-bore 1.5-T MRI system. We note that real-time MRI guidance has the additional advantage of a complete absence of patient and operator exposure to ionizing radiation.

Keywords: epidural injection • facet joint injection • interventional MRI • nerve root injection • spinal injection

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?