AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brancatelli, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pealer, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brancatelli, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pealer, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2782
AJR 2009; 192:1341-1347
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Focal Confluent Fibrosis in Cirrhotic Liver: Natural History Studied with Serial CT

Giuseppe Brancatelli1,2, Richard L. Baron3, Michael P. Federle2,4, Gianvincenzo Sparacia1 and Karen Pealer2

1 Istituto di Radiologia, Università di Palermo, Via Villaermosa 29, 90139 Palermo, Italy.
2 Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
3 Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
4 Present address: Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term natural history of focal confluent fibrosis in cirrhotic liver with CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed in consensus 118 liver CT examinations in 26 patients (19 men, seven women; age range, 32–68 years; mean age, 50 years) performed over approximately 6 years. Helical CT scans were obtained before and 30–35 and 65–70 seconds after injection of 125–150 mL of contrast medium at a rate of 4–5 mL/s. Proof of cirrhosis was based on liver transplantation (n = 6), biopsy (n = 9), or imaging findings (n = 11). The number, location, and attenuation of fibrotic lesions and presence of trapped vessels were evaluated. Variation of hepatic retraction associated with the development of focal confluent fibrosis lesions was assessed using the ellipsoid volume formula and an arbitrary retraction index.

RESULTS. Each radiologist identified 41 focal confluent fibrosis lesions. All lesions were identified by both radiologists. Twelve patients (46%) had a single lesion, 13 (50%) had two lesions, and one (4%) had three lesions. Thirty-four (83%) of 41 lesions were located in segment IV, VII, or VIII. Thirty-two lesions (78%) were hypoattenuating on unenhanced images, 25 lesions (61%) were hypoattenuating on hepatic arterial phase images, and 20 lesions (49%) were isoattenuating on portal venous phase images. Seven lesions (17%) were or became hyperattenuating at follow-up on portal venous phase images. Trapped vessels were found in six lesions (15%). The retraction index showed a significant increase over time (r = 0.423, p ≤ 0.0001).

CONCLUSION. The degree of capsule retraction associated with focal confluent fibrosis evolves with time and relates to the natural evolution of cirrhosis.

Keywords: cirrhosis • CT • liver • liver fibrosis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.