AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lisanti, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lisanti, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, D. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.1646
AJR 2009; 192:1348-1358
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Pictorial Essay

Effects of Breath-Hold and Cardiac Cycle on the MRI Appearance of the Aorta and Inferior Vena Cava in T2 Abdominal Imaging

Christopher J. Lisanti1 and David B. Douglas2

1 Department of Radiology, Brooke Army Medical Center, 3851 Roger Brooke Dr., No. 3600, Ft. Sam Houston, TX 78234.
2 David Grant Medical Center, Travis AFB, CA.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to review the MR principles of blood signal and normal flow-related phenomena seen in the aorta and inferior vena cava (IVC) on T2-weighted images of the abdomen and to discuss the physiologic and physical basis of signal alterations with breath-hold imaging. We define time-of-flight (TOF) loss and list the factors that affect it; explain the physiologic effects of breath-hold imaging on both aortic and IVC waveforms and velocity; state which abdominal T2 imaging techniques are most susceptible to variable TOF effects and explain why based on physiologic effects and MR principles; and describe three trouble-shooting techniques to confirm that unexpected signal does not reflect pathology.

CONCLUSION. T2 images customarily result in TOF loss and dark blood signal. Abdominal MRI relies extensively on breath-hold imaging techniques that may alter markedly the flow velocity in normal vessels. This marked flow change results in signal heterogeneity and variable TOF loss especially with faster sequences filling k-space in shorter time frames. Breath-hold imaging decreases k-space fill time, and of the breath-hold T2 techniques, single-shot fast spin-echo decreases k-space fill time the most. Atypical blood signal during breath-hold imaging may mimic pathology, but abnormal findings can be verified by review of other sequences and planes of imaging.

Keywords: abdominal imaging • aorta • cardiac imaging • breath-hold imaging • hemodynamics • inferior vena cava • MRI


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.