|
|
||||||||
Pictorial Essay |
1 Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer
Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
2 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital
Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
3 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital
Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
4 Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to illustrate workflow, benefits, and limitations of centerline analysis compared with double oblique multiplanar reformations using aortic CT angiography data.
CONCLUSION. Semiautomatic centerline analysis is beneficial for the assessment of aortic geometry and allows precise measurements of aortic diameters and lengths. It can be simple, fast, and reproducible, but it should be used with care considering its inherent limitations. Manually adjusted multiplanar reformations remain an essential tool for intuitive visualization of the vascular anatomy.
Keywords: aorta centerline analysis computer-assisted image processing three-dimensional imaging spiral CT
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |