AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matsuoka, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hatabu, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matsuoka, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hatabu, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.1730
AJR 2009; 192:1651-1656
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Vascular Enhancement and Image Quality of MDCT Pulmonary Angiography in 400 Cases: Comparison of Standard and Low Kilovoltage Settings

Shin Matsuoka1, Andetta R. Hunsaker, Ritu R. Gill, Isabel B. Oliva, Beatrice Trotman-Dickenson, Francine L. Jacobson and Hiroto Hatabu

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the vascular enhancement and image quality of pulmonary CT angiography performed with lower peak kilovoltage settings in a large patient sample.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board, which waived the requirement for informed consent. Four hundred patients believed to have a pulmonary embolism were studied. All patients underwent 16- or 64-MDCT with automatic tube current modulation. The 200 patients in the standard peak kilovoltage group (mean age, 57 years; range, 22–95 years) underwent MDCT at 130 or 120 kVp. The 200 patients in the low peak kilovoltage group (mean age, 56 years; range, 21–92 years) underwent MDCT at 110 or 100 kVp. Vascular enhancement was evaluated by measurement of the attenuation value in the main pulmonary artery and segmental and subsegmental arteries. Image noise was quantified by measurement of the SD of the attenuation value in the main pulmonary artery. One blinded radiologist assessed image quality using visual scores. Wilcoxon's rank test was used to evaluate differences between the groups.

RESULTS. Mean vascular enhancement in the main pulmonary artery had significantly higher attenuation values in the low peak kilovoltage group (376.1 ± 102.9 HU) than in the standard peak kilovoltage group (309.2 ± 94.8 HU) (p < 0.0001). Mean attenuation values in all measured segmental and subsegmental arteries were significantly higher in the low peak kilovoltage group than in the standard peak kilovoltage group (p < 0.0001). Image noise in the low peak kilovoltage group was significantly higher than in the standard peak kilovoltage group (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the image quality scores of the two groups (p = 0.116).

CONCLUSION. Lowering kilovoltage improved vascular enhancement without deterioration of image quality. The results of our study confirm previously reported preliminary findings.

Keywords: CT • lung • pulmonary angiography • pulmonary embolism • radiation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.