AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ng, A. W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kam, C. K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ng, A. W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kam, C. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.1544
AJR 2009; 192:1690-1695
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Assessment of Capsular Laxity in Patients With Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocation Using MRI

Alex Wing Hung Ng1, C. M. Chu1, W. N. Lo2, Y. M. Lai1 and C. K. Kam1

1 Department of Radiology, North District Hospital 9, Po Kin Rd., Sheung Shui, New Territories 111111, Hong Kong, SAR.
2 Department of Orthopaedics, North District Hospital, Sheung Shui, Hong Kong, SAR.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to investigate the usefulness of MRI in assessing capsular laxity in patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The records of 64 consecutive patients (the study group consisted of 58 patients, 45 male and 13 female; average age, 39.3 years; range, 13–82 years) who underwent MR arthrography between October 2002 and May 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into three groups: group A, no shoulder dislocation; group B, first dislocation; and group C, recurrent dislocation. The maximum capsular widths at the anterior, anteroinferior, and inferior regions in the neutral and abducted and externally rotated (ABER) positions were measured on oblique sagittal images. The relationship of capsular width with the number of dislocations, type of capsular attachment, presence of anteroinferior labral tear, and patient sex were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI and clinical tests in detecting capsular laxity were also calculated.

RESULTS. Among all three patient groups, there were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the widths with the shoulder in the ABER position and the degree of capsular tightening at the anterior region. The average maximum width was largest in group C and smallest in group A. There was a significant difference in the degree of anterior capsular tightening in groups B and C. A moderate correlation of capsular width and anterior tightening (R = –0.45) with number of shoulder dislocations was found. There was a significant difference in capsular width and capsular tightening in relation to the presence of an anteroinferior labral tear. The sensitivity and specificity to detect capsular laxity were 92% and 100%, respectively, for clinical tests and 85% and 96% for MRI.

CONCLUSION. MRI is a useful and objective method to assess capsular laxity in patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation.

Keywords: MR arthrography • MRI • recurrent shoulder dislocation • shoulder dislocation • sports medicine


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.