AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donnelly, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by Muething, S. E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donnelly, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by Muething, S. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.2086
AJR 2009; 193:165-171
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Improving Patient Safety: Effects of a Safety Program on Performance and Culture in a Department of Radiology

Lane F. Donnelly1,2, Julie M. Dickerson1, Martha A. Goodfriend3 and Stephen E. Muething2,3

1 Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, MLC 5031, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039.
2 Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
3 Department of Quality Improvement, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.

OBJECTIVE. Emphasis is being placed on improving the safety performance of the health care delivery system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a program on safety performance and culture in a pediatric radiology department.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A comprehensive safety program implemented in a department of radiology included error prevention training for all employees, a safety coach program, safety awards, Crucial Conversations training, and operational rounds with radiology leaders. The number of serious safety events (events with deviation from best practice, patient harm, and causation) that in part involved radiology were compared for 2 years after implementation of the program and the previous 2 years (baseline). A U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality safety culture survey was distributed to radiology employees, and the responses were compared for periods early in the program and after full implementation of the program. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate for statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in the survey responses and the frequency of serious safety events.

RESULTS. Before introduction of the safety program, radiology contributed to a serious safety event an average of once every 200 days as opposed to once in 780 days after implementation of the program (one event in more than two academic years) (p = 0.37). Improvement was found in all 12 dimensions of the culture survey after implementation of the program. Radiology scored higher than hospital averages in 10 of 12 dimensions of the survey.

CONCLUSION. The safety program had a positive effect on safety culture. Although it is early in the process and proving statistical significance for rare events such as serious safety events is difficult, the mean number of days between serious safety events has increased from 200 to 780. We conclude that the program is having a positive effect on safety performance.

Keywords: patient safety • safety program


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.