HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Wilson, S. R. Articles by Andrew, A. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wilson, S. R. Articles by Andrew, A. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Volume Imaging in the Abdomen With Ultrasound: How We Do It

¹ Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29 St., NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
² Department of Community Health Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
³ Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of volumetric acquisition of the abdominal organs using performance guidelines that we developed in our preliminary experience.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Mechanical volumetric acquisitions of each abdominal organ, including the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys, spleen, bowel, and aorta, were performed in 200 consecutive patients.

RESULTS. One thousand four hundred fifty-four volume data sets were graded for feasibility of performance and technical adequacy from I (impossible, incomplete) to V (excellent, complete). The most successfully imaged organ was the right kidney (grades IV and V, 95.0%) and the least successfully imaged, the spleen (grades IV and V, 69.0%). Very good to excellent grades (IV and V) were obtained in 1,215 (83.6%) of the 1,454 volumes. One hundred twelve (7.7%) of the 1,454 volumes were failures (grades I and II). The three organs with the highest success compared with the right kidney were the left kidney, gallbladder, and liver. The data sets of all the other organs showed a statistically significant difference in the feasibility of performance from the right kidney. Liver acquisition failures were associated with end-stage liver cirrhosis (n = 6), fatty liver (n = 3), and obesity (n = 3). Other acquisition failures, similar to conventional sonography, were associated with bowel gas interference and poor acoustic window. The technical limitations include poor resolution in the B and C planes and a limited range of frequencies; these limitations can be overcome in the future with matrix transducers and introduction of the technology to a broader frequency range.

CONCLUSION. Volumetric acquisition in the abdomen performed using defined guidelines is feasible with recognized limitations. Technology advances will improve this imaging technique in the future.

Keywords: 3D volume imaging • abdomen • abdominal imaging • bowel • imaging guidelines • ultrasound technique

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?