AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sundaram, B.
Right arrow Articles by Francis, I. R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sundaram, B.
Right arrow Articles by Francis, I. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.1801
AJR 2009; 193:471-478
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Can CT Features Be Used to Diagnose Surgical Adult Bowel Intussusceptions?

Baskaran Sundaram1, Carl N. Miller1,2, Richard H. Cohan1, Matthew J. Schipper1,3 and Isaac R. Francis1

1 Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Cardiovascular Center #5481, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5868.
2 Present address: The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
3 Present address: Innovative Analytics, Kalamazoo, MI.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to identify whether any CT characteristics can be used to diagnose surgical intussusceptions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A search of CT reports on adults revealed 118 patients with 136 intussusceptions. Two blinded readers independently reviewed the CT examinations and documented intussusception characteristics. Medical records were reviewed to determine patient outcome. Performance, interobserver agreement (A), and significance of CT characteristics to identify surgical intussusceptions were calculated.

RESULTS. Of 95,223 CT examinations, 0.13% (121/95,223) documented 136 intussusceptions over a 7-year period, of which 88.2% (120/136) were enteroenteric, 3.7% (5/136) were enterocolic, and 4.4% (6/136) were colocolic lesions or in other locations. Eight (5.9%) were surgical and 128 (94.12%) were nonsurgical lesions. Five of eight (63%) surgical lesions involved the colon. Only two of eight surgical lesions had malignant lead points. The mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for diagnosing surgical enteroenteric lesions using a measured lesion length of > 3.5 cm were 100%, 57.3%, 5.7%, and 100% (A = 0.68), respectively. Similar figures using the measured axial diameter > 3 cm were 100%, 32.9%, 3.7% and 100% (A= 0.65), respectively.

CONCLUSION. Surgical intussusceptions in adults are infrequent among the intussusceptions that are detected on CT. Most enteroenteric lesions are nonsurgical lesions, whereas lesions that affect the colon are often surgical. Many nonsurgical enteroenteric intussusceptions are longer than 3.5 cm and thicker than 3 cm, suggesting these CT features may not be useful for diagnosing surgical bowel intussusceptions in adults.

Keywords: abdomen • bowel • CT • gastrointestinal imaging • gastrointestinal tract • intussusceptions


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.