AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Toncheva, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Toncheva, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.2274
AJR 2009; 193:1019-1024
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Early First Trimester Fetal Dose Estimation Method in a Multivendor Study of 16- and 64-MDCT Scanners and Low-Dose Imaging Protocols

Tracy A. Jaffe1, Amy M. Neville1, Colin Anderson-Evans2, Sheldon Long3, Carolyn Lowry1, Terry T. Yoshizumi2 and Greta Toncheva2

1 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Erwin Rd., Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.
2 Department of Occupational and Environmental Safety Office, Radiation Safety Division, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
3 Siemens Healthcare, CSG Solutions, Cary, NC.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to corroborate the relation between the estimated absorbed fetal dose derived from directly measured uterine doses early in the first trimester and the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) for 16- and 64-MDCT of the maternal chest, abdomen, and pelvis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Estimated absorbed fetal dose was measured with a metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeter placed in the expected uterine location in an anthropomorphic phantom of a woman and scanned with 16- and 64-MDCT units of one vendor and a 64-MDCT unit of another vendor. A trauma chest, abdomen, and pelvis protocol and an abdomen and pelvis protocol were used. Absorbed uterine dose was measured directly from the MOSFET detector. The CTDIvol for each protocol was recorded from the scanner console. Correlation between mean uterine dose and CTDIvol was tested with a goodness of fit model.

RESULTS. The absorbed uterine dose ranged from 9.25 to 37.7 mGy. Absorbed fetal dose in the early first trimester correlated with CTDIvol in a linear regression equation. For the 16-MDCT scanner, at 130 kVp, the fetal dose was 2.091 x CTDIvol 9.489. For the 64-MDCT scanner from the same vendor, at 120 kVp, the fetal dose was 1.113 x CTDIvol + 1.773. For the 64-MDCT scanner from the other vendor, at 120 kVp, the fetal dose was 1.378 x CTDIvol – 1.014. The goodness of fit results (R2) for the equations were 0.97, 0.98, and 0.99.

CONCLUSION. Estimated absorbed fetal dose during the first trimester of pregnancy is linearly associated with CTDIvol regardless of beam energy, detector configuration, and scanner manufacturer.

Keywords: CT dosimetry • fetal dose • pregnancy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.