AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, F. P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gasparetto, E. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, F. P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gasparetto, E. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.09.2522
AJR 2009; 193:1030-1035
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Assessment of Breast Lesions With Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Comparing the Use of Different b Values

Fernanda Philadelpho Arantes Pereira1,2,3, Gabriela Martins1,2, Eduardo Figueiredo4, Marisa Nassar Aidar Domingues1,2, Romeu Cortes Domingues1,2, Lea Mirian Barbosa da Fonseca1,3 and Emerson Leandro Gasparetto1,2,3

1 Clínica de Diagnóstico Por Imagem, Rua Ataulfo de Paiva, 669, 2nd floor, Leblon, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 22649-900.
2 Multi-imagem Ressonância, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
3 Department of Radiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
4 GE Healthcare, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

OBJECTIVE. Our purpose was to study the utility of diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions by assessing the best b values.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty-five women (mean age, 46.1 years) with 52 focal mass breast lesions underwent diffusion-weighted imaging with different b values. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of each lesion was calculated from the ADC maps done using five b values (0, 250, 500, 750, and 1,000 s/mm2) and using b values of 0 s/mm2 with each other b value separately (0 and 250 s/mm2, 0 and 500 s/mm2, 0 and 750 s/mm2, 0 and 1,000 s/mm2). The mean ADC values were correlated with imaging findings and histopathologic diagnoses. The cutoff ADC value, sensitivity, and specificity of diffusion-weighted imaging to differentiate benign and malignant lesions were calculated in all b value combinations. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS. The mean ADC value was significantly lower for malignant lesions compared to benign lesions (p < 0.0001) in all b value combinations. No statistical difference was seen between the ADC obtained from different b value combinations (p = 0.2581) in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. The ADC calculated from b 0 and 750 s/mm2 was slightly better than the other b value combinations, showing a sensitivity of 92.3% and a specificity of 96.2%.

CONCLUSION. Diffusion-weighted imaging is a potential resource as a coadjutant of MRI in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. Such imaging can be performed without a significant increase in examination time, especially because it can be done with lower b values.

Keywords: breast cancer • b values • diffusion-weighted imaging • MRI


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.