HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Summers, R. M. Articles by Pickhardt, P. J. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Summers, R. M. Articles by Pickhardt, P. J. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Automated Measurement of Colorectal Polyp Height at CT Colonography: Hyperplastic Polyps Are Flatter Than Adenomatous Polyps

¹ Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bldg. 10, Rm. 1C368X, MSC 1182, Bethesda, MD 20892-1182.
² Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC.
³ Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, WI.

OBJECTIVE. Hyperplastic polyps are more difficult to detect than adenomatous polyps at CT colonography (CTC), and it has been theorized that this difference in detectability is because hyperplastic polyps are flatter. Using automated software that computes polyp height, we determined whether hyperplastic colonic polyps on CTC are indeed flatter than adenomatous polyps of comparable width.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. At three medical centers, 1,186 patients underwent oral contrast-enhanced CTC and same-day optical colonoscopy (OC) with segment unblinding for colorectal cancer screening. One hundred eighty-five of the patients had at least one hyperplastic or adenomatous polyp 6–10 mm visible at both OC and CTC, where size was determined by a calibrated guidewire at OC. To assess flatness, the heights of the polyps at CTC were measured using a validated automated software program. The heights and height-to-width ratios of the hyperplastic polyps were compared with those of the adenomatous polyps using a Student's t test (two-tailed, unpaired, unequal variance).

RESULTS. There were 176 adenomatous and 83 hyperplastic polyps visible at segment-unblinded OC. The fraction of these polyps that were measurable at CTC using the automated software was not significantly different for adenomatous versus hyperplastic polyps (158/176 [89.8%] vs 73/87 [83.9%], respectively; p = 0.2). The average height-to-width ratios using automated width measurements were 15% less for hyperplastic polyps: 0.39 ± 0.20 (n = 158) and 0.33 ± 0.19 (n = 73) for adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps, respectively (p = 0.03). When polyps of comparable OC size or CTC width were considered, the heights of hyperplastic polyps were up to 27% less than those of adenomatous polyps.

CONCLUSION. For 6–10 mm polyps of a given size as determined by OC or a given width at CTC, hyperplastic polyps tend to be flatter (i.e., have lower height) compared with adenomatous polyps.

Keywords: automated size measurement • colonoscopy • colorectal cancer screening • CT colonography • optical colonoscopy

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?