AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Angel, E.
Right arrow Articles by McNitt-Gray, M. F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Angel, E.
Right arrow Articles by McNitt-Gray, M. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.09.2886
AJR 2009; 193:1340-1345
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Dose to Radiosensitive Organs During Routine Chest CT: Effects of Tube Current Modulation

Erin Angel1,2, Nazanin Yaghmai1, Cecilia Matilda Jude1, John J. DeMarco1, Christopher H. Cagnon1, Jonathan G. Goldin1, Cynthia H. McCollough3, Andrew N. Primak3,4, Dianna D. Cody5, Donna M. Stevens5,6 and Michael F. McNitt-Gray1

1 Departments of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
2 Present address: Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., 2441 Michelle Dr., Tustin, CA 92780.
3 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN.
4 Present address: Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Malvern, PA.
5 Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
6 Present address: Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University Healthcare, Portland, OR.

OBJECTIVE. The aims of this study were to estimate the dose to radiosensitive organs (glandular breast and lung) in patients of various sizes undergoing routine chest CT examinations with and without tube current modulation; to quantify the effect of tube current modulation on organ dose; and to investigate the relation between patient size and organ dose to breast and lung resulting from chest CT examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty voxelized models generated from images of patients were extended to include lung contours and were used to represent a cohort of women of various sizes. Monte Carlo simulation–based virtual MDCT scanners had been used in a previous study to estimate breast dose from simulations of a fixed-tube-current and a tube current–modulated chest CT examinations of each patient model. In this study, lung doses were estimated for each simulated examination, and the percentage organ dose reduction attributed to tube current modulation was correlated with patient size for both glandular breast and lung tissues.

RESULTS. The average radiation dose to lung tissue from a chest CT scan obtained with fixed tube current was 23 mGy. The use of tube current modulation reduced the lung dose an average of 16%. Reductions in organ dose (up to 56% for lung) due to tube current modulation were more substantial among smaller patients than larger. For some larger patients, use of tube current modulation for chest CT resulted in an increase in organ dose to the lung as high as 33%. For chest CT, lung dose and breast dose estimates had similar correlations with patient size. On average the two organs receive approximately the same dose effects from tube current modulation.

CONCLUSION. The dose to radiosensitive organs during fixed-tube-current and tube current–modulated chest CT can be estimated on the basis of patient size. Organ dose generally decreases with the use of tube current–modulated acquisition, but patient size can directly affect the dose reduction achieved.

Keywords: CT • Monte Carlo simulation • radiation dose • tube current modulation • voxelized patient model


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.