AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mustonen, A. O. T.
Right arrow Articles by Koskinen, S. K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mustonen, A. O. T.
Right arrow Articles by Koskinen, S. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.2260
AJR 2009; 193:1354-1360
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Postoperative MDCT of Tibial Plateau Fractures

Antti O. T. Mustonen1, Mika P. Koivikko1, Martti J. Kiuru2, Jari Salo3 and Seppo K. Koskinen1

1 Department of Radiology, Helsinki Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Töölö Trauma Center, Topeliuksenkatu 5, FIN–00029, Helsinki, Finland.
2 Suomen Terveystalo, Helsinki, Finland.
3 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Töölö Trauma Center, Helsinki, Finland.

OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this retrospective study were to elaborate our experience in postoperative MDCT of tibial plateau fractures, to establish the frequency of these fractures and the indications for MDCT, and to assess the common findings and their clinical importance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 782 knee injuries were imaged with MDCT at a level 1 trauma center over 86 months. A total of 592 knees had a tibial plateau fracture; 381 of these fractures were managed surgically, and postoperative MDCT was performed on 36 of these knees (9%). At postoperative image analysis, an orthopedic surgeon evaluated reduction as good or suboptimal using the first postoperative radiographs. Fracture healing was determined as complete ossification, partial ossification, or nonunion on MDCT images acquired later in follow-up. The MDCT findings were compared with the radiographic findings to assess the usefulness and clinical importance of MDCT.

RESULTS. The main indications for MDCT were assessment and follow-up of the joint articular surface and evaluation of fracture healing. Orthopedic hardware caused no diagnostic problems at MDCT. Postoperative MDCT revealed additional clinically important information on 29 patients (81%), and 14 patients (39%) underwent reoperation.

CONCLUSION. Postoperative MDCT of tibial plateau fractures is performed infrequently, even in a large trauma center. When it is performed, however, because of suspicion of increasing articular step-off or fracture nonunion, postoperative MDCT reveals clinically significant information in most cases.

Keywords: knee • MDCT • postoperative • tibial plateau fracture


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.