AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanigawa, N.
Right arrow Articles by Sawada, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanigawa, N.
Right arrow Articles by Sawada, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.09.2774
AJR 2009; 193:W442-W445
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Cement Leakage in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Compression Fractures With or Without Intravertebral Clefts

Noboru Tanigawa1, Shuji Kariya1, Atsushi Komemushi2, Takanori Tokuda1, Miyuki Nakatani1, Rie Yagi1 and Satoshi Sawada1

1 Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata Hospital, 2-3-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1191, Japan.
2 Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Takii Hospital, Moriguchi, Osaka, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to compare the incidence and location of cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures with and without intravertebral clefts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Percutaneous vertebroplasty was performed in 120 consecutive patients with 300 osteoporotic compression fractures. The cement volume injected was recorded. The cement leakage was evaluated using spinal radiography, MRI, and fluoroscopy during the procedure and CT after the procedure.

RESULTS. One hundred seven vertebrae contained intervertebral clefts, and 193 vertebrae had no clefts. The cement volume injected (± SD) was 4.0 ± 2.0 and 3.6 ± 1.6 mL into vertebrae with clefts and without clefts, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.14). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of cement leakage between vertebrae with clefts (53 of 107) and those without clefts (78 of 193) (p = 0.13). Leakage occurred into the epidural veins (12 of 107), perivertebral soft tissues (7 of 107), disks (41 of 107), intervertebral foramen (1 of 107), and spinal canal (1 of 107) in fractures with clefts and into the epidural veins (47 of 193), perivertebral soft tissues (13 of 193), disks (25 of 193), paravertebral veins (5 of 193), large vein (2 of 193), lung (2 of 193), intervertebral foramen (1 of 193), and spinal canal (1 of 193) in fractures without clefts. Cement leakage into the epidural vein was significantly more frequent in vertebrae without clefts (p < 0.01). Disk leakage was significantly more frequent in vertebrae with clefts compared with those without clefts (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of cement leakage between vertebrae with clefts and without clefts. However, cement leakage into the epidural vein was significantly more frequent in vertebrae without clefts and disk leakage was significantly more frequent in vertebrae with clefts.

Keywords: cement leakage • clefts • osteoporosis • vertebroplasty


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.