AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sandrasegaran, K.
Right arrow Articles by Aisen, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sandrasegaran, K.
Right arrow Articles by Aisen, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.09.2436
AJR 2009; 193:1556-1560
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Value of Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Assessing Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis

Kumaresan Sandrasegaran1, Fatih M. Akisik1, Chen Lin1, Bilal Tahir1, Janaki Rajan1, Romil Saxena2 and Alex M. Aisen1

1 Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 N University Blvd., UH 0279, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
2 Department of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to determine the usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of liver parenchyma for determining the severity of liver fibrosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. This study investigated 78 patients who underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with 1.5-T MRI and pathologic staging of liver fibrosis based on biopsy. DWI was performed with b values of 50 and 400 s/mm2. ADCs of liver were measured using 2.0- to 3.0-cm2 regions of interest in the right and left lobes of the liver; the mean ADC value was used for analysis. Pathologic METAVIR scores for liver fibrosis stage were used as a reference standard.

RESULTS. The mean ADC values for fibrosis pathologically staged using the METAVIR classification system as F0 (n = 11), F1 (n = 16), F2 (n = 10), F3 (n = 14), and F4 (n = 27) were 125.9, 105.0, 104.5, 103.2, and 99.1 x 10-5 s/mm2, respectively. The correlation between the ADC values and the degree of liver fibrosis was moderate (Spearman's test, {rho} = –0.36). There was a significant difference in ADC values between patients with nonfibrotic liver (F0) and those with cirrhotic liver (F4) (p = 0.008). The best cutoff ADC value to distinguish between these groups was 118 x 10-5 s/mm2. However, ADC values were not useful for differentiating viral hepatitis patients with F2 fibrosis or higher from those with a lower degree of fibrosis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.66) or for differentiating low-stage fibrosis in all patients from high-stage fibrosis in all patients (AUC = 0.54).

CONCLUSION. The ADCs in cirrhotic livers are significantly lower than those in nonfibrotic livers. However, ADC values measured using the current generation of scanners are not reliable enough to replace liver biopsy for staging hepatic fibrosis.

Keywords: apparent diffusion coefficient • cirrhosis • diffusion-weighted imaging • liver fibrosis • MRI


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.