AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Partridge, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lehman, C. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Partridge, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lehman, C. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.2139
AJR 2009; 193:1716-1722
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging as an Adjunct to Conventional Breast MRI for Improved Positive Predictive Value

Savannah C. Partridge1, Wendy B. DeMartini1, Brenda F. Kurland2, Peter R. Eby1, Steven W. White1 and Constance D. Lehman1

1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave. E, G3-200, Seattle, WA 98109-1023.
2 Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to investigate whether adding diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) could improve the positive predictive value (PPV) of breast MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The retrospective study included 70 women with 83 suspicious breast lesions on DCE-MRI (BI-RADS 4 or 5) who underwent subsequent biopsy. DWI was acquired during clinical breast MRI using b = 0 and 600 s/mm2. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were compared for benign and malignant lesions. PPV was calculated for DCE-MRI alone (based on biopsy recommendations) and DCE-MRI plus DWI (adding an ADC threshold) for the same set of lesions. Results were further compared by lesion type (mass, nonmasslike enhancement) and size.

RESULTS. Of the 83 suspicious lesions, 52 were benign and 31 were malignant (11 ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS], 20 invasive carcinoma). Both DCIS (mean ADC, 1.31 ± 0.24 x 10–3 mm2/s) and invasive carcinoma (mean ADC, 1.29 ± 0.29 x 10–3 mm2/s) exhibited lower mean ADC than benign lesions (1.70 ± 0.44 x 10–3 mm2/s, p < 0.001). Applying an ADC threshold of 1.81 x 10–3 mm2/s for 100% sensitivity produced a PPV of 47% versus 37% for DCE-MRI alone, which would have avoided biopsy for 33% (17/52) of benign lesions without missing any cancers. DWI increased PPV similarly for masses and nonmasslike enhancement and preferentially improved PPV for smaller (≤ 1 cm) versus larger lesions.

CONCLUSION. DWI shows potential for improving the PPV of breast MRI for lesions of varied types and sizes. However, considerable overlap in ADC of benign and malignant lesions necessitates validation of these findings in larger studies.

Keywords: apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) • breast • diffusion-weighted MRI • MRI • positive predictive value


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.