AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sohn, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sohn, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.09.3128
AJR 2010; 194:38-43
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Diagnostic Approach for Evaluation of Lymph Node Metastasis From Thyroid Cancer Using Ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy

Yu-Mee Sohn1,2, Jin Young Kwak1, Eun-Kyung Kim1, Hee Jung Moon1, Soo Jin Kim1 and Min Jung Kim1

1 Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 250 Seongsanno, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, South Korea.
2 Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to investigate ultrasound criteria to determine the most accurate criterion to differentiate metastatic from benign lymph nodes on ultrasound and to evaluate the frequency of metastasis according to the cytology results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred eighteen consecutive patients with thyroid malignancy underwent fine-needle biopsy of suspicious lymph nodes. We investigated the diagnostic performance of each ultrasound feature (loss of fatty hilum, presence of cystic change or calcification, hyperechogenicity, and round shape) and ultrasound criteria 1 and 2. We considered criterion 1 to be if one of the aforementioned malignant ultrasound findings was present and criterion 2 to be if one of the aforementioned malignant ultrasound findings, excluding the loss of fatty hilum, was present. Cytology results were divided into metastasis, macrophages without malignant cells, cell paucity, and negative for malignancy, and we evaluated the frequency of metastasis.

RESULTS. There were 91 metastatic and 27 benign nodes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of criterion 2 was significantly higher than that of criterion 1. The frequency of metastasis was highest with a cytologic result of metastasis (95.8%), followed by macrophages without malignant cells (87.5%), cell paucity (71.4%), and negative for malignancy (34.4%).

CONCLUSION. The most accurate ultrasound criterion to differentiate metastatic from benign lymph nodes was ultrasound criterion 2 (any suspicious ultrasound features except for loss of fatty hilum), and we should not neglect lymph nodes with suspicious ultrasound features, even if they do not contain malignant cells on cytology.

Keywords: fine-needle aspiration biopsy • lymph node metastasis • ultrasound


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.