AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.09.3106
AJR 2010; 194:W186-W192
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Relation Between Total Renal Volume and Renal Function: Usefulness of 3D Sonographic Measurements With a Matrix Array Transducer

Hyun Cheol Kim1, Dal Mo Yang1, Wook Jin1 and Sang Ho Lee2

1 Department of Radiology, East-West Neo Medical Center, Kyung Hee University, 149 Sangil-dong, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 134-727, Republic of Korea.
2 Department of Internal Medicine, East-West Neo Medical Center, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

OBJECTIVE. The aims of this study were to evaluate the reproducibility of 3D sonography with a matrix array transducer as a means of measuring renal volume and to investigate correlations between renal volume and renal function.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. One hundred twenty subjects (20 consecutively registered patients with one of the five stages of chronic renal disease and 20 healthy volunteers [stage 0 renal function]) were enrolled. Individual renal volume was determined by two independent observers using 2D sonographic and 3D matrix array transducer sonographic data. The reproducibility of volume measurement was evaluated for both of these methods. After total renal volume was normalized to body surface area, correlations between normalized total renal volume and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were evaluated. Differences in normalized total renal volume related to stage of renal function also were evaluated.

RESULTS. The reproducibility of 3D sonographic measurements obtained with a matrix array transducer was greater than that of 2D sonographic measurements. The correlation between normalized total renal volume obtained with matrix array transducer 3D sonography and estimated GFR for two observers (r = 0.809 and 0.813; p < 0.001) was better than that between normalized total renal volume obtained with 2D sonography and estimated GFR (r = 0.696 and 0.715; p < 0.001). The mean normalized total renal volumes obtained with matrix array transducer 3D sonography in stages 0 and 1 were significantly larger than those in other stages (p < 0.001). The mean normalized total renal volume in stage 5 disease was significantly smaller than the volumes in the other stages (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION. Three-dimensional sonography with a matrix array transducer is a reliable means of measuring renal volume during evaluations of patients with reduced renal function.

Keywords: kidney • measurement • sonography • three-dimensional • ultrasound • volume


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.