|
|
||||||||
Pictorial Essay |
1 All authors: Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St., Boston, MA 02115.
OBJECTIVE. The objectives of this article are to review the new Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline, version 1.1, highlighting the major changes in the new version compared with the original RECIST guideline (version 1.0), and to present case examples with representative imaging.
CONCLUSION. Familiarity with the revised RECIST is essential in day-to-day oncologic imaging practice to provide up-to-date service to oncologists and their patients. Some of the changes in the revised RECIST affect how radiologists select, measure, and report target lesions.
Keywords: CT oncologic imaging response assessment Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors RECIST RECIST 1.1 tumor measurement
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |