AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HINCK, V. C.
Right arrow Articles by HOPKINS, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by HINCK, V. C.
Right arrow Articles by HOPKINS, C. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 97, 141-153, Copyright © 1966 by American Roentgen Ray Society

NORMAL INTERPEDICULATE DISTANCES (MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM) IN CHILDREN AND ADULTS

VINCENT C. HINCK M.D.1, WILLIAM M. CLARK JR. M.D.1, and CARL E. HOPKINS PH.D.1

1 From the Departments of Radiology and Pediatrics of the University of Oregon Medical School, Portland; and the School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California

In this article refined maximum and minimum interpediculate distances are published for use in diagnosis of intraspinal tumor and detection of spinal canal stenosis. The subject of spinal canal stenosis due to decrease of interpediculate distances is virtually unexplored. Availability of minimum norms should facilitate such studies.

Concerning spinal canal stenosis due to diminished interpediculate distances, it is apparent that (a) there is such an anomaly, (b) it may, but need not be, associated with diminished mid-sagittal diameter of the spinal canal, and (c) it may be symptomatic. Illustrative cases are presented.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. H. Lee, B. K. Seo, Y. C. Choi, H. J. Shin, J. H. Park, H. J. Jeon, K. A. Kim, C. M. Park, and B. H. Kim
Using MRI to Evaluate Anatomic Significance of Aortic Bifurcation, Right Renal Artery, and Conus Medullaris When Locating Lumbar Vertebral Segments
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1295 - 1300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.