AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BECKER, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BECKER, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 98, 96-101, Copyright © 1966 by American Roentgen Ray Society

DRIP INFUSION PYELOGRAPHY

ITS EVALUATION AS A ROUTINE EXAMINATION

JOSHUA A. BECKER M.D.1

1 From the Department of Radiology, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York

Infusion pyelography is not indicated as the routine intravenous examination. There is no greater incidence of satisfactory diagnostic studies than with lower dose methods. Artefacts of technique, profound nephrogram and diuresis are distinct disadvantages.

The value of this form of urography for the examination of the patient with impaired renal function and for nephrotomography is confirmed.

The method is indicated after an unsatisfactory

[See figure in the PDF file]

urographic study and prior to retrograde pyelography.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.