AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HEINZ, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by WEENS, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by HEINZ, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by WEENS, H. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 98, 672-674, Copyright © 1966 by American Roentgen Ray Society

POST-ANGIOGRAPHY ISOTOPE BRAIN SCANNING

POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE?

E. R. HEINZ M.D.1, J. R. BRYLSKI M.D.1, J. L. IZENSTARK M.D.1, and H. S. WEENS M.D.1

1 From the Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia

In the last several years there have been statements in the medical literature that brain scans may demonstrate variable increases in radioactivity following carotid arteriography. It is possible that some of these areas of increased radioactivity might be interpreted as "false positives."

Ten patients are reported in whom routine neurologic evaluation by scanning showed no evidence of abnormal radioactivity and cerebral arteriography followed by repeat brain scans with Hg197 likewise showed no evidence of abnormal radioactivity. In those patients in whom greater quantities of contrast material are given or in whom a technical artifact is created by a faulty arterial puncture, certainly, it is possible that cerebral injury with alterations of the blood brain barrier might be produced. However, in well performed, routine, cerebral arteriography, this is probably not a significant factor.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.