AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CORREA, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by MARCIAL, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by CORREA, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by MARCIAL, V. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 99, 302-312, Copyright © 1967 by American Roentgen Ray Society


CARCINOMA OF THE FLOOR OF THE MOUTH

REVIEW OF CLINICAL FACTORS AND RESULTS OF TREATMENT

JOSÉ N. CORREA M.D.1, ANTONIO BOSCH M.D.1, and VICTOR A. MARCIAL M.D.1

1 From the Radiotherapy and Cancer Division, Puerto Rico Nuclear Center, the Radiotherapy Department, Dr. I. González Martínez Oncologic Hospital, and the University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine

1. The experience at the I. González Martínez Oncologic Hospital with 157 cases of carcinoma of the floor of the mouth between the years 1940 and 1965, inclusive, is reviewed.

2. The sex incidence and etiologic factors are discussed. Carcinoma of the floor of the mouth has been the second most frequent form of cancer of the oral cavity seen in our institution.

3. The methods of treatment are discussed and the results of treatment are given in terms of 5 year survival, being 28.1 per cent for the entire series.

4. Patients with localized small lesions limited to the floor of the mouth without lymph node metastases (Stage 1 lesions) had the best 5 year survival rate (68.5 per cent).

5. The treatment modality which yielded the best results was external irradiation followed by interstitial curietherapy (45.2 per cent), including lesions of all stages.

6. The most frequent complication to treatment encountered was radionecrosis of the mandible and/or soft tissues (15 per cent).

7. Six patients were treated with iridium 192 implantation; in 5 of the 6 the implantation was preceded by a course of external therapy of whom 2 were controlled and 1 patient with a small lesion was treated successfully with iridium 192 implantation alone.

8. We believe that radical surgery is best employed for the treatment of lymph node metastases and for the management of recurrent or residual primary lesions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.