AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garmer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mathias, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garmer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mathias, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Digital Radiography Versus Conventional Radiography in Chest Imaging

Diagnostic Performance of a Large-Area Silicon Flat-Panel Detector in a Clinical CT-Controlled Study

Marietta Garmer1, Svenja P. Hennigs1, Horst J. Jäger1, Felicitas Schrick1, Thomas van de Loo1, Andreas Jacobs1, Axel Hanusch1, Andreas Christmann2 and Klaus Mathias1

1 Department of Clinical Radiology, Staedtische Kliniken Dortmund, Beurhausstra. 40, 44137 Dortmund, Germany.
2 Computing Center and Department of Statistics, University of Dortmund, August-Schmidt-Stra. 12, 44221 Dortmund, Germany.



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. —Mediastinal abnormalities revealed by digital (solid line) and conventional (dashed line) radiography. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve of digital radiography is greater than corresponding area of conventional radiography, indicating better performance of digital radiography for diagnosis of mediastinal abnormalities.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.