AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruehm, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Debatin, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruehm, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Debatin, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Pelvic and Lower Extremity Arterial Imaging

Diagnostic Performance of Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography

Stefan G. Ruehm1,2, Thomas F. Hany1, Thomas Pfammatter1, Ernst Schneider3, Mark Ladd1,2 and Jörg F. Debatin1,2

1 Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
2 Present address: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
3 Institute of Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.



View larger version (90K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. —Photograph shows volunteer wrapped in multichannel quadrature-phased array peripheral vascular coil (Medical Advances, Milwaukee, WI). Coil consists of four circular arrays. Flexible design of coil allows bilateral vascular imaging in close proximity to anatomy of interest. Each element covers territory of 24 cm (total coverage, 96 cm) and can be activated separately or in combination with one other element. Patients are placed in coil so that first two coil elements cover pelvis and thighs while second set covers popliteal artery and trifurcation vessels.

 


View larger version (96K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. —62-year-old man with 10-year history of diabetes. Axial multiphase gradient-echo image at level of lower thigh after administration of 2-ml contrast test bolus shows regions of interest (A and B) that are placed over superficial femoral artery bilaterally to obtain signal-intensity curve for both sides. Half time to maximum signal intensity is determined in both legs. Delayed value is used as scan delay. Display is immediately available on operating console.

 


View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3A. —71-year-old man with episodes of right calf claudication. Lateral MR angiogram with maximum intensity projection shows acquisition volumes of superior and inferior three-dimensional data set in craniocaudal extension. Note required anteroposterior offset.

 


View larger version (63K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3B. —71-year-old man with episodes of right calf claudication. Frontal view of MR angiographic data set shows vascular graft extending from superficial femoral to popliteal artery. Note mild stenosis (arrow) in distal segment.

 


View larger version (66K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3C. —71-year-old man with episodes of right calf claudication. Corresponding digital subtraction angiogram of femoropopliteal runoff reveals femoropopliteal graft.

 


View larger version (130K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4A. —63-year-old man with bilateral leg claudication. Cut film angiogram of pelvic region showing severe stenoses of right proximal common iliac artery, left distal common femoral artery (arrowhead), and proximal superficial femoral artery (arrow). In anteroposterior projection, area of femoral bifurcation is difficult to assess.

 


View larger version (91K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4B. —63-year-old man with bilateral leg claudication. Three-dimensional MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection image in anteroposterior projection shows good correlation with conventional angiography. Long arrow indicates left distal common femoral artery; short arrow indicates proximal superficial femoral artery.

 


View larger version (116K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4C. —63-year-old man with bilateral leg claudication. MR angiogram with 30° rotated maximum intensity projection of superior data set provides better view of severe stenoses of left distal common femoral (arrowhead) and proximal superficial femoral artery (arrow).

 


View larger version (129K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5A. —81-year-old man with left leg claudication. Conventional angiogram reveals occlusion of left superficial femoral artery (arrow) in adductor canal. Occlusion is well collateralized by vessels originating from deep femoral artery.

 


View larger version (96K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5B. —81-year-old man with left leg claudication. Three-dimensional MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection image shows occlusion (arrow). Collateral vessels are also well visualized.

 


View larger version (45K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6A. —79-year-old man with claudication of right calf during exercise. Conventional angiogram shows following findings: irregularity of distal aorta, severe stenosis of right distal superficial femoral artery (arrow), mild stenosis of left superficial femoral artery (arrowhead), proximal occlusion of all trifurcation vessels on right side, proximal occlusion of proximal anterior and posterior tibial artery on left side, and severe atherosclerotic changes of left peroneal artery.

 


View larger version (83K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6B. —79-year-old man with claudication of right calf during exercise. Three-dimensional MR projection angiogram reveals good correlation with findings of conventional angiography. Occlusion of runoff vessels was correctly diagnosed.

 


View larger version (78K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7A. —71-year-old woman with pain in left lower calf during exercise. This case is example of overestimation of stenosis using MR angiography. This discrepancy may be caused by projection-related limitations of conventional angiography. Other findings such as mild stenosis in mid third of left superficial femoral artery, severe stenosis of distal superficial femoral artery, and occlusion of popliteal artery on left side were correctly diagnosed on MR angiography. Trifurcation of runoff vessels as normal variant on right side and filling of proximal segments of anterior and peroneal artery after occlusion by collateral vessels on left side are displayed by both three-dimensional MR angiography and conventional angiography. Three-dimensional MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection images in anteroposterior projection (A) and rotated view (B) show lesion of external iliac artery (arrow) immediately distal to origin of internal iliac artery. Lesion was interpreted as severe.

 


View larger version (65K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7B. —71-year-old woman with pain in left lower calf during exercise. This case is example of overestimation of stenosis using MR angiography. This discrepancy may be caused by projection-related limitations of conventional angiography. Other findings such as mild stenosis in mid third of left superficial femoral artery, severe stenosis of distal superficial femoral artery, and occlusion of popliteal artery on left side were correctly diagnosed on MR angiography. Trifurcation of runoff vessels as normal variant on right side and filling of proximal segments of anterior and peroneal artery after occlusion by collateral vessels on left side are displayed by both three-dimensional MR angiography and conventional angiography. Three-dimensional MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection images in anteroposterior projection (A) and rotated view (B) show lesion of external iliac artery (arrow) immediately distal to origin of internal iliac artery. Lesion was interpreted as severe.

 


View larger version (51K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7C. —71-year-old woman with pain in left lower calf during exercise. This case is example of overestimation of stenosis using MR angiography. This discrepancy may be caused by projection-related limitations of conventional angiography. Other findings such as mild stenosis in mid third of left superficial femoral artery, severe stenosis of distal superficial femoral artery, and occlusion of popliteal artery on left side were correctly diagnosed on MR angiography. Trifurcation of runoff vessels as normal variant on right side and filling of proximal segments of anterior and peroneal artery after occlusion by collateral vessels on left side are displayed by both three-dimensional MR angiography and conventional angiography. Corresponding conventional digital subtraction angiogram shows same lesion as A and B. Lesion was graded as irregular in presence of plaque (arrow).

 


View larger version (88K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8A. —65-year-old woman with bilateral knee pain during exercise. This case is example of overestimation of stenosis using MR angiography. Three-dimensional MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection images in anteroposterior (A) and rotated (B) views. Severe stenosis was diagnosed at origin of left peroneal artery (arrowhead) and mild stenosis at origin of right peroneal artery (arrow). Rotated view is of inferior volume.

 


View larger version (85K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8B. —65-year-old woman with bilateral knee pain during exercise. This case is example of overestimation of stenosis using MR angiography. Three-dimensional MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection images in anteroposterior (A) and rotated (B) views. Severe stenosis was diagnosed at origin of left peroneal artery (arrowhead) and mild stenosis at origin of right peroneal artery (arrow). Rotated view is of inferior volume.

 


View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8C. —65-year-old woman with bilateral knee pain during exercise. This case is example of overestimation of stenosis using MR angiography. Conventional angiograms of right trifurcation arteries (C) and left trifurcation arteries (D) were interpreted as normal.

 


View larger version (57K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8D. —65-year-old woman with bilateral knee pain during exercise. This case is example of overestimation of stenosis using MR angiography. Conventional angiograms of right trifurcation arteries (C) and left trifurcation arteries (D) were interpreted as normal.

 


View larger version (83K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9A. —51-year-old male smoker. This case is example of underestimation of stenosis using MR angiography and points to semantic difficulties associated with classification of vascular morphology and can be regarded as example of interobserver variability rather than failure of MR angiography to accurately estimate vascular disease. Anteroposterior projection of three-dimensional MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection image shows multiple irregularities of right superficial femoral artery. Lesion in distal third of superficial femoral artery (arrow) was characterized as mild.

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9B. —51-year-old male smoker. This case is example of underestimation of stenosis using MR angiography and points to semantic difficulties associated with classification of vascular morphology and can be regarded as example of interobserver variability rather than failure of MR angiography to accurately estimate vascular disease. Conventional angiogram shows same lesion (arrow) as that in A. Lesion was characterized as severe.

 


View larger version (52K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10A. —55-year-old man who underwent imaging for assessment of vascular graft. Conventional angiogram (A) and MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection image (B). Aneurysmal changes of vascular graft can be reliably assessed on three-dimensional MR angiography. Metallic clip in midhalf of graft shows typical artifact (arrow).

 


View larger version (118K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10B. —55-year-old man who underwent imaging for assessment of vascular graft. Conventional angiogram (A) and MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection image (B). Aneurysmal changes of vascular graft can be reliably assessed on three-dimensional MR angiography. Metallic clip in midhalf of graft shows typical artifact (arrow).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.